|
Post by special on Apr 4, 2011 19:06:54 GMT -5
ummm there seems to be a few issues with your vote counts... you should make sure they are correct before posting them.... What are the issues with the vote counts?
|
|
|
Post by Renata on Apr 4, 2011 19:22:01 GMT -5
SisC, you didn't address what I think is the strongest point against you, the comment about Archangel re: Paranoia.
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Apr 4, 2011 20:07:46 GMT -5
(Posted in wrong thread, sorry) Color-coded Day 1 vote count: Archangel(4): Renata[245-355], Mental[319], Bill[331], FCoD[349], Special[382] FCoD (3): Archangel[377], Septimus[404], Lightfoot[477] Special (2): Suburban[92], MentalGuy[147-194], Joanie[156], Special[170-248], Archangel[217-253], Renata[225-245], Pinkies[227-256]Paranoia (2): Renata[94-195], Renata[200-225], Guiri[272], Renata[469] Bill (2): FCoD[400], GnarlyCharlie[471] Lightfoot (1): Renata[355-469], Inner[401] Septimus (1): Romanic[412] Scuzzlebutt (1): Sister[457] Pinkies (0): Special[49-170] MentalGuy (0): Renata[195-200]Renata (0): Archangel[253-358]Inner (0): Lightfoot[402-477] Non-voters (6): Mahaloth, Peeker, GreedySmurf, [Scuzzlebutt], Storyteller, ParanoiaHow are you guys feeling about the votes on Special Ed now? Do you still think there must be scum involved? Who? I'm not sure I understand your response. You suspected 3 players of being scum. 2 of them voted Archangel so it's two of Renata, Mental, Bill and FCoD (excluding Special) and one of them voted Special so it's either Suburban, Mental, Joanie, Renata or Pinkies (excluding Archangel and Special) and this is why you felt Special and Archangel were Town. But then you voted Inner Stickler, who just happened to vote you in the previous post. If you were sufficiently confident that there was scum on their bandwagons as to consider them Town, why didn't you vote or make a case on any of the players you suspected were scum earlier? Hope things clear up for you soon, when come back bring correct username! ummm there seems to be a few issues with your vote counts... you should make sure they are correct before posting them.... MY response to your paragraph was answered @ guiri you have become quite the task master calling me on nearly every line item. (I forget who added the sarcasm in response but it did make me chuckle) @ guiri you have become quite the task master calling me on nearly every line item. (I forget who added the sarcasm in response but it did make me chuckle) I should begin by stating I probably would have been better off reading and not typing last night after a few toddies.. What I think I was reasoning ......since I feel that some of the voters are SCUM, then the person they are voting for is likely TOWN Renata is all over the board with her votes. And Inner Stickler I felt came out of nowhere at me with a short post and a vote. In general, yes I post some of my reasoning (for some too much) in an effort to find out if others are 'seeing' the same things I think I am seeing. That is how I play. Type too much=suspicious Type too little=suspicious If you recall (I know your memory is flawless) My first post on that subject was after a few toddies. The vote on Istickler … suppose part of it really was OMGUS and part of it was I felt he blindsided me and SCUM like to do that. I was trying to flesh out what I thought I meant the first time. During that post the boards were wonky AND I was at work. . I did change my vote in an effort to make it count (hopefully against a scum) but it made no difference. Atleast I voted
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Apr 4, 2011 20:24:16 GMT -5
I didn't have time for a long drawn out post and I didn't want to give any of you poorly written arguments to jump all over when real SCUM needed to be lynched.
|
|
|
Post by special on Apr 4, 2011 20:34:38 GMT -5
I didn't have time for a long drawn out post and I didn't want to give any of you poorly written arguments to jump all over when real SCUM needed to be lynched. I don't understand you very well. I've read through your posts and I get a lot of this. At least I'm Town, blah blah blah. I'm not doing obviously scummy things, blah blah blah. I'm really starting to think you're likely to be Scum, the only thing holding me back is my inability to understand you.
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Apr 4, 2011 20:57:44 GMT -5
I didn't have time for a long drawn out post and I didn't want to give any of you poorly written arguments to jump all over when real SCUM needed to be lynched. I don't understand you very well. I've read through your posts and I get a lot of this. At least I'm Town, blah blah blah. I'm not doing obviously scummy things, blah blah blah. I'm really starting to think you're likely to be Scum, the only thing holding me back is my inability to understand you. This coming from someone that makes perfect sense all the time........................................ ( just got some really disturbing news IRL so I will try not to type in anger AT you. I comment and I vote I try to answer the questions I am asked even when I think the answer was obvious from what i bloody well said. You play your way . I get the impression that attacking the new kids is a sport for some of you. When I do type something I think is helpfull it seems to be ignored Rock On
|
|
|
Post by special on Apr 4, 2011 21:06:30 GMT -5
This coming from someone that makes perfect sense all the time........................................ ( just got some really disturbing news IRL so I will try not to type in anger AT you. I comment and I vote I try to answer the questions I am asked even when I think the answer was obvious from what i bloody well said. You play your way . I get the impression that attacking the new kids is a sport for some of you. When I do type something I think is helpfull it seems to be ignored Rock On hehe fair enough. I often don't make sense myself. I don't think I single out newer players for my attacks, I think those more experienced know how to handle my aggression better. I never mean any offense. You post a lot. I like that. You post your thoughts. I think that's good too. I'll need to look at things in depth, but for the time being, with great respect... Vote: Lightfoot mostly because you keep repeating how much you, a TOWN player, are looking for SCUM.
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Apr 4, 2011 21:19:00 GMT -5
This coming from someone that makes perfect sense all the time........................................ ( just got some really disturbing news IRL so I will try not to type in anger AT you. I comment and I vote I try to answer the questions I am asked even when I think the answer was obvious from what i bloody well said. You play your way . I get the impression that attacking the new kids is a sport for some of you. When I do type something I think is helpfull it seems to be ignored Rock On hehe fair enough. I often don't make sense myself. I don't think I single out newer players for my attacks, I think those more experienced know how to handle my aggression better. I never mean any offense. You post a lot. I like that. You post your thoughts. I think that's good too. I'll need to look at things in depth, but for the time being, with great respect... Vote: Lightfoot [/color] mostly because you keep repeating how much you, a TOWN player, are looking for SCUM. [/quote] Fair enough of course Thanks I think for the almost .. before you voted me As far as I know I have not voted for (or is it against) TOWN. I backed metal and you . Attempted to save archangel who I thought was town and it turns out was.. And yet I'm top on your radar The Day is long we shall see what transpires
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Apr 4, 2011 21:22:18 GMT -5
NETA I was not singling you out as the ONE that attacks newer players I did say " some of you Read my words man. Of course if you understand me others may think you've lost it
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Apr 4, 2011 21:32:00 GMT -5
now back to more game Renata voted all over the board. I find that suspicious (would love to hear the reasoning)
FCOD and ISickler rub me wrong. (to coin a phrase)
The players that have not posted for a while tweek my radar BUT RL may have happened so I hesitate to throw rocks. (well not big ones
|
|
|
Post by Inner Stickler on Apr 4, 2011 21:40:37 GMT -5
*strokes with the fur*
|
|
|
Post by special on Apr 4, 2011 21:41:59 GMT -5
Fair enough of course Thanks I think for the almost .. before you voted me As far as I know I have not voted for (or is it against) TOWN. I backed metal and you . Attempted to save archangel who I thought was town and it turns out was.. And yet I'm top on your radar The Day is long we shall see what transpires Underlining mine. It translates as: Look at what a good TOWNIE I am. I never did anything bad like vote for a TOWNIE! Of course, who would know well enough to not vote for a town player? Only the Scum. And who would want the credit for acting like a Townie? The Scum.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Pinkies on Apr 4, 2011 21:42:42 GMT -5
Thanks lightfoot for your explaination, I understand it now... Your voting record is incorrect because of the scambled names... That makes complete since to me.
I did in fact vote for several players in the previous day... I voted for ED, I voted for BILLMC. my vote for BILL did not show up in your vote count.
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Apr 4, 2011 21:52:10 GMT -5
Thanks lightfoot for your explaination, I understand it now... Your voting record is incorrect because of the scambled names... That makes complete since to me. I did in fact vote for several players in the previous day... I voted for ED, I voted for BILLMC. my vote for BILL did not show up in your vote count. That wasn't my vote count. And I did note that my 'unvote' was not scored.
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Apr 4, 2011 21:58:44 GMT -5
Fair enough of course Thanks I think for the almost .. before you voted me As far as I know I have not voted for (or is it against) TOWN. I backed metal and you . Attempted to save archangel who I thought was town and it turns out was.. And yet I'm top on your radar The Day is long we shall see what transpires Underlining mine. It translates as: Look at what a good TOWNIE I am. I never did anything bad like vote for a TOWNIE! Of course, who would know well enough to not vote for a town player? Only the Scum. And who would want the credit for acting like a Townie? The Scum. OR someone that didn't wanna get killed for no reason.... Thanks for the Ed ucation.
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on Apr 4, 2011 22:36:20 GMT -5
Some RL issues have come up that are going to keep me out of commission until Wednesday. I'll be back to catch up then.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Pinkies on Apr 4, 2011 22:41:00 GMT -5
That wasn't my vote count. And I did note that my 'unvote' was not scored. Sorry about that, that is guiri's vote count... my bad....
|
|
|
Post by septimus on Apr 5, 2011 4:36:52 GMT -5
Is everyone getting the same number of Snacks each morning? Is there some way to negotiate questions/challenges on that to gain knowledge or scum-hunt? I'm not ashamed to admit that I need the comments of strong experienced players to help me understand the game. I know that Inner Stickler is a strong player, yet I see only one post from him that comments explicitly on the game: I don't see where the scumminess is and I'm inclined to believe Ed's claim to be Daphne. I may not see the scumminess of Ed's and Mental's claims either, but neither do I see the towniness. I'd be happy for an explanation using one-syllable words. Despite my poor participation, I am trying to concentrate on the game. In fact last night I dreamed of Ed! he's sexy as hell. I can't keep my hands off of him. No, it wasn't that kind of dream. In fact if your Snack was intended as some sort of flirtation, you can just have it back. Give 1 snack to Special Ed Give 1 snack to Mental Guy Give 1 snack to Inner Stickler
|
|
|
Post by Renata on Apr 5, 2011 7:33:39 GMT -5
now back to more game Renata voted all over the board. I find that suspicious (would love to hear the reasoning) I vote for whoever I find most suspicious at the time (excepting the odd end-of-day circumstance when a strategic vote may be more useful). Especially in the early game, that tends to mean a lot of vote changes for me. Ed, if you're analyzing LightFoot, don't neglect to give some thought to his apparent confusion yesterday over whether or not the scum have day talk.
|
|
|
Post by Renata on Apr 5, 2011 7:37:17 GMT -5
Septimus why did you just give a snack to someone you're apparently suspicious of?
|
|
|
Post by special on Apr 5, 2011 8:09:26 GMT -5
Ed, if you're analyzing LightFoot, don't neglect to give some thought to his apparent confusion yesterday over whether or not the scum have day talk. OK You mean I should consider if it was a feeble attempt at Scum misdirection or actual confusion by a Townie? I'm done considering that.
|
|
|
Post by septimus on Apr 5, 2011 8:20:04 GMT -5
Septimus why did you just give a snack to someone you're apparently suspicious of? (a) Right now, I'm suspicious of all y'all. (b) Maybe I want to listen for sounds of gloating when he says "Thank you."
|
|
|
Post by Renata on Apr 5, 2011 8:23:34 GMT -5
Ed, if you're analyzing LightFoot, don't neglect to give some thought to his apparent confusion yesterday over whether or not the scum have day talk. OK You mean I should consider if it was a feeble attempt at Scum misdirection or actual confusion by a Townie? I'm done considering that. Well all right, carry on then.
|
|
|
Post by Renata on Apr 5, 2011 8:25:22 GMT -5
Septimus why did you just give a snack to someone you're apparently suspicious of? (a) Right now, I'm suspicious of all y'all. (b) Maybe I want to listen for sounds of gloating when he says "Thank you." (a) is just a dodge, surely. Not all suspicion is created equal. Your other two went to Mental Guy and Ed, who are more or less consensus town. Yet the third went to one of the only people you've pointed to as perhaps suspicious. Why?
|
|
|
Post by The Real FCOD on Apr 5, 2011 8:26:29 GMT -5
It's not just you Ed, I can't understand what the heck LightFoot is talking about either. She's like the female peeker, with manners. It's frustrating but I don't find it necessarily scummy.
--FCOD
|
|
|
Post by Inner Stickler on Apr 5, 2011 8:32:49 GMT -5
I know that Inner Stickler is a strong player, yet I see only one post from him that comments explicitly on the game: Why do people keep saying this? I don't think there's any evidence for it. Not so much Ed as Mentalguy but he's saying stuff that rings true to me that I'm having a hard time believing scum could guess at. And Ed's tied into Mentalguy's claim. That's all I'm going to say about it for now.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Apr 5, 2011 9:35:09 GMT -5
Just popping in to say I'm here, I'm working on this, and I'll have a post regarding the Day One voting on Ed presently.
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on Apr 5, 2011 10:16:00 GMT -5
SisC, you didn't address what I think is the strongest point against you, the comment about Archangel re: Paranoia. Short version: I screwed up, and completely forgot about the Scooby Snacks thing when I responded to Archangel's comment about Paranoia. HOWEVER, I wasn't meaning anything about Archangel, just that I at that moment I didn't see the case she was making about Paranoia, because I'd forgotten. That said: Vote: Paranoia Until or unless he does explain that inconsistency that I had forgotten about.
|
|
|
Post by Renata on Apr 5, 2011 10:17:38 GMT -5
Paranoia's dead. He was the second kill last night, presumed but not certainly non-scum.
|
|
|
Post by Renata on Apr 5, 2011 10:18:09 GMT -5
NETA: The killer, that is; Paranoia was town.
|
|