RoOsh
FGM
Former BatMod
[on:Wanna see a magic trick?][of:See You, Space Cowboy....]
Posts: 284
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by RoOsh on Dec 20, 2007 0:14:03 GMT -5
Captain Klutz (2) - CometotheDarkSideWeHaveCookies, episodeofblonde drainbead (2) - DeathbyIrony, atarus ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies (2) - Parzival, Captain Klutz Tragic (1) - diggitcamara/quote] Wow... A three way tie? Well currently my suspect lists are: Cookies, Episode & CaiSv2.0 together... Zumav2.0
With the EoS towards Klutz, because he looks townie to me on first glance, but :shrug: I dunno if i can just say "yeah, I believe him 100%". But I'm gonna go with he's not the dude who should be getting killing right now. :sigh: So little votes so far. And I'm actually a part of it, which I never like being (Last 24 hours -_- ) :sucks in chest: Guess I gotta be a man, huh, and break the tie? I'm gonna go with Vote Cookies, rather than one-off vote or waste a vote. but I reserve the right to switch my vote to another one of the 3. Cookies, can you explain your last post better- the "Doubt/Distraction" one? It's left a bad taste in my mouth.... So until further notice/explanation from you, I'll plunk down my vote on you. But I do have questions: Episode: What do you think of Parzival? And Klutz? CaiSv2.0- How do you feel about Episode of Blonde's interactions with you? Cookies- How do you feel about Capt. Klutz? And CaiSv2.0?
|
|
Santo Rugger
Mome Rath
The Obviously Innocent Townie
The Rugger formerly known as Pygmy[on:BYAHH!][of:BYAHH?]
Posts: 3
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Santo Rugger on Dec 20, 2007 0:46:09 GMT -5
Whoah, how'd I let the end of the Day sneak up on me?
Vote Cookies
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 20, 2007 0:53:33 GMT -5
CaiSv2.0- How do you feel about Episode of Blonde's interactions with you? Have you read my posts at all Roosh? I consider her to be one of the Replicants. Her posts towards me are defensive mainly because I have attacked her over what I consider to be issues. She has agreed with my reasoning on a couple of points mainly to do with Captain Klutz. This pings me slightly. There is less interaction that I thought on second reading.
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 20, 2007 1:09:30 GMT -5
Well considering everything, I am switching to my scum suspect number 2.
vote drainbead
|
|
RoOsh
FGM
Former BatMod
[on:Wanna see a magic trick?][of:See You, Space Cowboy....]
Posts: 284
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by RoOsh on Dec 20, 2007 1:29:02 GMT -5
CaiSv2.0- How do you feel about Episode of Blonde's interactions with you? Have you read my posts at all Roosh? I consider her to be one of the Replicants. Her posts towards me are defensive mainly because I have attacked her over what I consider to be issues. She has agreed with my reasoning on a couple of points mainly to do with Captain Klutz. This pings me slightly. There is less interaction that I thought on second reading. Yes, I got that you find her Suspicious. But i was hoping to hear more of your opinions on the INTERACTIONS like what you do think of her motives/reasons/such. Basically, do you feel it's more in reaction to what you've said? Or is it coincidental? Or do you feel it's been deliberate towards you? Or is it something more nefarious, but not involving yourself? Since I doubt you're gonna say if it's nefarious but involves yourself.... I know you find her suspicious, but I wanted to know what you thought not of her, but of Her dealings with Yourself mostly. Just to clarify the Question.
|
|
|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Dec 20, 2007 2:03:09 GMT -5
I think Klutz is scum, and if my pursuit of him is being spun as a "distraction", I don't really care what you call it. This Colony needs something to distract/derail it from status quo of electrocuting the citizenry. The consensus has had really shitty luck catching scum, and I have managed not to support the town-on-town violence for a couple of nights. I consider this a good thing, and I think it is part of the reasons why I'm being doggedly pursued.
We still have the better part of a day in this Day, so I hope it offers time enough to implement a proposal.
I am The Medic. By night I can choose to watch over one other player or myself. If the watchee is attacked by Night (and is not a replicant) I can provide medical care and potentially save his/her life. If I watch over a replicant, my ignorance of their anatomy renders my skills moot, and I offer no life-saving chance to them.
I've self-protected on all Nights except last Night. However, the object of my Medic services, atarus, was not attacked last Night, so it was not my actions that facilitated us all waking up this morning, as much as I would've liked it to have been. I was not attacked or interacted with in any way that I am aware of at any time.
I'm not exactly sure what I may or may not bear witness to if I do happen to watch over someone who is attacked. My PM pretty clearly states not to expect to see much, but it also says that I may be able to get close enough to see what the person is doing that I've watched over all Night if they do happen to be attacked. I will see any kill attempt on the object of my watching. The possible outcomes that I am aware of are:
My charge was not attacked.
If I succeed in rescuing my charge/myself.
If I fail in rescuing my charge (some rare occasions of violence may cause injuries that are beyond my skills, or, as stated previously, they were a replicant and I didn't know it).
Or if something else (no visibility as to whether it is third party protection or self-protection on the part of the target) interferes with the kill. In this case, I am made aware of the attack, but that my services were not needed because there were no injuries.
It was explained to me that there are other possibilites as to outcomes and color attributed to those outcomes, depending on the specific situation and variables, but it was not necessary for me to know what all of them were, so the rest are still locked in the vault of story's mind.
Now, finally, to my proposal. I think that if the rest of the masons claimed and confirmed eachother, that the resulting pool of confirmed Colonists and semi-confirmed Colonists (even some of the folks currently voting for me) would be large enough to net multiple scum.
If y'all don't like that idea, that's cool, but since my claim is true and honest I'd appreciate it if you didn't fry me.
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 20, 2007 2:15:25 GMT -5
Bastards, Bastards, Bastards. Each and every one of you Mods is a Bastard. From the opening colour The Nexus-9 gathered a small group of rogue Replicants - each uniquely specialized in some way. It secured them false names and identifications, and scattered the group on four separate flights to the OWC called New Canaan. Each replicant is going to have a good roleclaim pre set up before the game in the same way as occured in Firefly for Fanty and Mingo. They will not be perfect, but it will require the town to suss out the logical flaws. As I said before: Bastards.
|
|
Santo Rugger
Mome Rath
The Obviously Innocent Townie
The Rugger formerly known as Pygmy[on:BYAHH!][of:BYAHH?]
Posts: 3
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Santo Rugger on Dec 20, 2007 2:15:56 GMT -5
unvote CookiesI think there's a Dr in this game, and I'm still very confused as to why there were no kills last Night. But, if there's another doctor, I'll expect to see a counter soon, so I'm going to roll with this one for now. <snip> Now, finally, to my proposal. I think that if the rest of the masons claimed and confirmed eachother, that the resulting pool of confirmed Colonists and semi-confirmed Colonists (even some of the folks currently voting for me) would be large enough to net multiple scum. If y'all don't like that idea, that's cool, but since my claim is true and honest I'd appreciate it if you didn't fry me. I agree. Here's what I think it's looking like... People I'm not going to be happy to see gone soon: 1. atarus 2. Captain Klutz 4. CometotheDarkSideWeHaveCookies 9. kassia 13. Santo Rugger 14. sinjin That's six Night kills the scum have to make, while playing WiFoM with Cookies. That leaves us: 3. CatinaSuit v. 2.0 (Hal Briston) 5. Death by Irony 6. diggitcamara 7. drainbead 8. episodeofblonde 10. Kat v. 2.0 (Yattara) 11. Parzival 12. Roosh 15. Tragic (hazelnutcoffee) 16. zuma Version 2.0 (Blaster Master) It's still pretty close to a toss up right now, but I think if atarus has two buddies, that'll put the game significantly into our court. I'd like to see the Masons revealed before the end of toDay, so we don't have a Monkgate if Atarus doesn't make it through the night. It'll also help us focus on who's left Tomorrow.
|
|
Santo Rugger
Mome Rath
The Obviously Innocent Townie
The Rugger formerly known as Pygmy[on:BYAHH!][of:BYAHH?]
Posts: 3
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Santo Rugger on Dec 20, 2007 2:19:35 GMT -5
Also, Roosh, I think there's more to you "thinking" that we started with 2 pro and 5 con replicants... this is as good a time as any to spill it.
|
|
Santo Rugger
Mome Rath
The Obviously Innocent Townie
The Rugger formerly known as Pygmy[on:BYAHH!][of:BYAHH?]
Posts: 3
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Santo Rugger on Dec 20, 2007 2:21:51 GMT -5
<snip>and scattered the group on four separate flights to the OWC called New Canaan. <snip> Four separate flights, plus the Nexus = 5?
|
|
|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Dec 20, 2007 2:25:14 GMT -5
I have to question the timing of your most recent statement, Cat. Have you been holding onto that bit of nostalgia from the opening color and the PM-forging that I did in a previous game and saving them for a little care package for just after my claim?
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 20, 2007 3:24:33 GMT -5
I have to question the timing of your most recent statement, Cat. Have you been holding onto that bit of nostalgia from the opening color and the PM-forging that I did in a previous game and saving them for a little care package for just after my claim? Actually, Cookies darling, I have no problem with your role claim. It feels, for the want of a better word, "complete". Personally, and I know you lot hate it and think it is scummy, but I want to see drainbead role claim. She said it was ready and written out, well then lets see it. If you are townie, you just narriow the pool. If you're not, you confirm my Bastard Mod suspicions.
|
|
|
Post by kassia on Dec 20, 2007 4:12:28 GMT -5
Okay so I've done a complete read-through and here are the people topping my list.
Episodeofblonde Roosh's analysis of her posts was pretty (read obsessively) thorough so there is really no need to do it all again. Basically, she has changed her vote constantly and with very little reason - and then makes that commet about votes not being precious. She says she'll do post analysis, then doesn't do it, instead asking others to do it for her. She just seems to be moving her vote around alot, with very little basis for it, and usually onto vanilla townies.
She tops my list right now, but since everyone seems to feel as if she shouldn't be voted for since she is not present at the moment, I will hold off on my vote as well.
I'm wondering why nobody has taken a look at Parzivalat all, and in fact he seems to have at least one supporter in the group with nothing really to give him any credence. I find this odd, so Tragic and Parzival are both on my list.
For now, I'm going to vote Parzival. There's just something off about his posts and he seems to have changed his playing strategy toDay - he's being much more vocal than he has been on past days. I'll try to put together a post analysis before the Day is over.
|
|
|
Post by Drain Bead on Dec 20, 2007 7:33:50 GMT -5
My husband came home from a business trip last night. As we were watching TV on the couch, he moved his knee and it completely locked up. He still can't straighten out his leg. We spent last night in the ER (fun!) and he's all hopped up on painkillers. Sorry all the crazy stuff keeps happening to keep me away from here. I can't believe he hurt his knee watching TV.
Since a couple days ago (whenever it was posted) I was leaning toward a vote based on similar logic to the kassia post directly above mine, but we ended up in different places with the same logic. I'm going to vote Tragic, due to the fact that she slipped Parzival's name into the semi-confirmed list for no good reason. Had she excused it by saying she got him confused with someone else, that would have been okay, but the reason she gave was...well, lame, to say the least. A true townie would not trust anyone to be semi-confirmed unless they had a roleclaim that seemed to confirm itself, like sinjin.
I don't think killing Parzival today accomplishes anything, though, and that's where kassia and I differ. Tragic slipped Parzival on the list for one of two reasons. Either he's town, and she's trying to garner favor with him for later, or he's scum and she's trying to guide the rest of us toward thinking that he's confirmed. Killing Parzival today won't get to the root of the issue, which is the fact that Tragic did something very scummy by trying to slip him on the semi-confirmed list when he's never claimed and has done nothing of note to deserve it.
|
|
|
Post by Tragic on Dec 20, 2007 8:23:48 GMT -5
re: Parvizal semi confirmed.
Basically this is an "open mouth, insert foot" moment.
I can't truly explain the rest of the reasoning behind my ranking. It was a stupid slip but I can't take it back. Nor can I give a proper explination about it other than to say that I'm not scum. Obviously you're not going to take me by my word for that one but it's the best I can offer at this juncture. *sigh*
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 20, 2007 8:47:54 GMT -5
re: Parvizal semi confirmed. Basically this is an "open mouth, insert foot" moment. I can't truly explain the rest of the reasoning behind my ranking. It was a stupid slip but I can't take it back. Nor can I give a proper explination about it other than to say that I'm not scum. Obviously you're not going to take me by my word for that one but it's the best I can offer at this juncture. *sigh* I think a little more explantion might be in order Although one question does spring to mind? Where you playing around with Parzival last night, considering something weird happened to him, which would be why you can semi-confirm him, given that sinjin has neither confirmed./denied any involvement? You haven't struck me as scummy, so I am looking forward to a bit more info.
|
|
|
Post by Tragic on Dec 20, 2007 9:06:17 GMT -5
I honestly can't give the explination you want. Or any that would make sense at this juncture.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Dec 20, 2007 9:08:32 GMT -5
OFFICAL VOTE COUNT - DAY FIVE, PAGE 7
drainbead (3) - DeathbyIrony, atarus, CatinaSuit v. 2.0 CometotheDarkSideWeHaveCookies (3) - Parzival, Captain Klutz, Roosh Captain Klutz (2) - CometotheDarkSideWeHaveCookies, episodeofblonde Tragic (2) - diggitcamara, drainbead Parzival (1) - kassia
Eleven votes have been cast. The Day will end today at 12:00PM, or in approximately 3 hours.
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 20, 2007 9:13:21 GMT -5
I honestly can't give the explination you want. Or any that would make sense at this juncture. Try us, I bet we've heard worse. Seriously.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Dec 20, 2007 10:23:36 GMT -5
Day Five ends in 90 minutes. Governor Rugger, given the vote situation, please be prepared to break any tie vote if necessary.
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 20, 2007 10:31:21 GMT -5
Day Five ends in 90 minutes. Governor Rugger, given the vote situation, please be prepared to break any tie vote if necessary. I think this end of day is going to throw a few people. I wasn't expecting it for another 6 1/2 hours or so. Oh well, that will teach me to read the start post of the Day
|
|
|
Post by Pollux Oil on Dec 20, 2007 10:54:38 GMT -5
Kinda worried we have a claimed medic in a tie for most votes with only an hour left in the Day. Either Cookies is the medic like she says (which I am about 80% believing her claim right now) or she's a scum figuring that she can claim doctor in the last 12 hours and hope the real doctor either a) doesn't show up to counter-claim before the Day ends or b) if there is a counter-claim, people will let both live since there's so little time to figure out who's the real one. I hate WIFOM. Also...so yesterday, about midway in the Day, when drainbead has 3 votes, she says she has a full role-claim ready and wants to know if she should reveal it. Today, with less than 12 hours to go before the lynch, she has 3 votes and is tied for most votes, and yet she comes in and slips in a vote and makes no mention of a role-claim. *sigh* Welp, at least I'm comfortable with my vote at this juncture.
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 20, 2007 11:03:46 GMT -5
Current non voters
Kat v. 2.0 Santo Rugger sinjin Tragic zuma Version 2.0
Grief this is worrying.
|
|
|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Dec 20, 2007 11:16:02 GMT -5
Unvote Klutz Vote drainbead
|
|
|
Post by Tragic on Dec 20, 2007 11:23:24 GMT -5
In light of the Role Claim by Captain Klutz... I'm going to have to vote my 2nd choice drainbead for this time around. This does not mean that I'm sold on the Role Claim. Or any in this very moment. I'm becoming highly suspicious of the number of Role Claims and I'd like to spend some time, as a community, tomorrow reviewing them. Because with as many as their have been (or have been insinuated) you've gotta step up and start questioning their validity.
Vote drainbead
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 20, 2007 11:23:31 GMT -5
unofficial vote count
drainbead (4) - DeathbyIrony, atarus, CatinaSuit v. 2.0, CometotheDarkSideWeHaveCookies
CometotheDarkSideWeHaveCookies (3) - Parzival, Captain Klutz, Roosh
Tragic (2) - diggitcamara, drainbead
Captain Klutz (1) - episodeofblonde
Parzival (1) - kassia
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 20, 2007 11:24:49 GMT -5
Typical,
You post a vote count and someones votes while your compiling it.
Make it 5 for drainbead
|
|
|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Dec 20, 2007 11:26:09 GMT -5
I agreed to the revised schedule, but didn't process that it would shorten toDay. I don't think I should've claimed any sooner though, as there wasn't enough pressure to warrant it, imho.
|
|
|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Dec 20, 2007 11:35:32 GMT -5
Bastards, Bastards, Bastards. Each and every one of you Mods is a Bastard. From the opening colour The Nexus-9 gathered a small group of rogue Replicants - each uniquely specialized in some way. It secured them false names and identifications, and scattered the group on four separate flights to the OWC called New Canaan. Each replicant is going to have a good roleclaim pre set up before the game in the same way as occured in Firefly for Fanty and Mingo. They will not be perfect, but it will require the town to suss out the logical flaws. As I said before: Bastards. The more I think about it, the more I don't see a basis for these fears. This set-up has key differences compared to the Firefly game.
|
|
|
Post by Tragic on Dec 20, 2007 11:38:48 GMT -5
Typical, You post a vote count and someones votes while your compiling it. Make it 5 for drainbeadYeah well.. I was in the post of making my vote and someone voted. So suddenly there wre 2 back to back votes and it confused me for a moment until I realized how long it took me to post lol. *glares menacingly at work* Evil.
|
|