|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 19:15:10 GMT -5
Post by tomscud on Jan 11, 2010 19:15:10 GMT -5
Note that the next vote on texcat will hammer him/her.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 19:17:48 GMT -5
Post by Sister Coyote on Jan 11, 2010 19:17:48 GMT -5
Ah, yes. I wasn't sure if I should mention that (I was aware) or not.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 19:27:13 GMT -5
Post by tomscud on Jan 11, 2010 19:27:13 GMT -5
Yeah. I have no problem with anyone casting vote #4, but I do think we would be better off giving texcat a decent amount of time.
The case as I see it has been about the same from everyone - not much quality participation so far, a weak vote on Ed resurrected for Day 2, forgetting about her suspicion of Peeker, and that statement about "hoping an investigator would have gotten something".
I don't hate this case and would be okay with this lynch as things stand.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 20:02:00 GMT -5
Post by special on Jan 11, 2010 20:02:00 GMT -5
I am willing to go along with a texcat lynching. I do not want to cast a hammer though until more people have checked in, because this was a relatively quick (hehe) swing in votes.
Since the consensus is not to lynch peeker but to see what happens with texcat, let me move peeker a little farther from a hammer:
Unvote: peeker
Vote: special ed
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 20:05:12 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jan 11, 2010 20:05:12 GMT -5
look, sis i was seriously irked that folks would continue down the "traditional" recruitment path. oh wring my hands tom can't be recruited and therefore must be town and trusted. i call bullshit. i was pissed and in a shitty mood. fuck you folks if you can't see it 'tude. but is reminded me that no matter what i have to play for my team even if they don't want me. fuck it, i came clean. that's why i posted my pm the way it was given me and any subsequent rejoinders from the mod.
and story look at the bball rankings. that's where the real game is. yaknow playoff and all that shit.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 20:29:32 GMT -5
Post by texcat on Jan 11, 2010 20:29:32 GMT -5
I'm going to claim. Although, I have nothing much to claim:
Lynch me or not. I'm not sure if there is any easy way to prove my claim, but I'm certainly willing to try.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 20:35:32 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jan 11, 2010 20:35:32 GMT -5
green. are you fracking kidding me.
which way did you choose?
i think i know.
unvote
vote texcat
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 20:40:08 GMT -5
Post by texcat on Jan 11, 2010 20:40:08 GMT -5
well, this is really interesting. I guess peek just wrote his own death certificate by hammering yet another townie.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 20:44:25 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jan 11, 2010 20:44:25 GMT -5
well, this is really interesting. I guess peek just wrote his own death certificate by hammering yet another townie. yeh, but if you are gobblin' it was the right play
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 20:56:32 GMT -5
Post by texcat on Jan 11, 2010 20:56:32 GMT -5
what was your hurry peek? it was the wrong play, and you let what a whole 5 minutes go by between my claim and your hammer?
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 21:04:14 GMT -5
Post by Hawkmod on Jan 11, 2010 21:04:14 GMT -5
what was your hurry peek? it was the wrong play, and you let what a whole 5 minutes go by between my claim and your hammer? Uh Texcat if you are dead aren't you supposed to stop talking? Or for some reason are you immune to the lynch. Peeker has got to be a PFK. Maybe he needs to hammer X number of players to win? (hopefully the number is greater than 2)
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 21:07:52 GMT -5
Post by special on Jan 11, 2010 21:07:52 GMT -5
Peeker has got to be a PFK. Maybe he needs to hammer X number of players to win? (hopefully the number is greater than 2) I doubt it, because all you need to do to hammer is be around when the vote is at H-1 plus, story is adding a time limit. But, what's odd, this time peeker wasn't really in any danger of being lynched since he was at H-3
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 21:22:51 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jan 11, 2010 21:22:51 GMT -5
what was your hurry peek? it was the wrong play, and you let what a whole 5 minutes go by between my claim and your hammer? hey, look. i had already typed my vote up for you. and then the whole green thing just confirmed it in my mind. i have said it for days that this puppy needs to pick it up. was i wrong, maybe. but at least tomorrow should be a short one if you flip town.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 21:24:04 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jan 11, 2010 21:24:04 GMT -5
but if you flip gobblin' then shit it was a coin flip. i took the bet and maybe i lost. best i can do.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 21:27:01 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jan 11, 2010 21:27:01 GMT -5
what was your hurry peek? it was the wrong play, and you let what a whole 5 minutes go by between my claim and your hammer? Uh Texcat if you are dead aren't you supposed to stop talking? Or for some reason are you immune to the lynch. Peeker has got to be a PFK. Maybe he needs to hammer X number of players to win? (hopefully the number is greater than 2) actually hawk my role is what my role said. i am a niller now. and i'd much rather have you guys coming down on a niller town than some other soul that just happened to toss the hammer.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 21:48:01 GMT -5
Post by storyteller0910 on Jan 11, 2010 21:48:01 GMT -5
Crap, I didn't see that coming. OK, Im out of the house right now and theres no way I can post the Dusk from an iphone. Going to have to wait until later tonight or first thing tomorrow morning. But in the meanwhile, im pretty sure texcat has been lynched and should cease substantive participation in this thread.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 21:57:21 GMT -5
Post by tomscud on Jan 11, 2010 21:57:21 GMT -5
And now, time for the cryptic night post: I have reason to believe (thanks to something that happened last night) that it could be hazardous for anyone (town or scum) to use a night action on me. Hazardous to the person using the night action, that is.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 21:59:35 GMT -5
Post by Renata on Jan 11, 2010 21:59:35 GMT -5
Jesus, peeker.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 22:00:46 GMT -5
Post by Renata on Jan 11, 2010 22:00:46 GMT -5
Um, Tom? Was that a cryptic claim for Kat or Sinjin?
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 22:03:53 GMT -5
Post by tomscud on Jan 11, 2010 22:03:53 GMT -5
Nope. It has nothing to do with anything that's been revealed in the thread.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 22:08:24 GMT -5
Post by Renata on Jan 11, 2010 22:08:24 GMT -5
OK.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jan 11, 2010 22:17:20 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jan 11, 2010 22:17:20 GMT -5
And now, time for the cryptic night post: I have reason to believe (thanks to something that happened last night) that it could be hazardous for anyone (town or scum) to use a night action on me. Hazardous to the person using the night action, that is. i'll play magic baggie as well. don't anyone dare to kill me tonight. and if you even think about a lynch that would be even worse. yeh, youbetcha.
|
|