|
Post by Suburban Plankton on Apr 2, 2012 9:33:27 GMT -5
About now would be a good time to hear from peeker, Nanook, and scathach.
As for Idle, just ignore him. He's not going to shut up, especially if he's getting under anyone's skin. After all, that's the sole reason he's posting at this point. Just remember that we can have absolutely zero confidence in anything he says Today, and don't worry about him.
|
|
|
Post by Pollux Oil on Apr 2, 2012 12:54:54 GMT -5
We have two deaths. If Suburban is to be believed, there was a third attempt. I'll believe Suburban for now, unless somebody else counterclaims the roleblocks Suburban has taken credit for. This doesn't look good for texcat, because if it's true she probably tried to kill either Lightfoot or Cookies. Suburban would have been an okay target, except Idle blew his load and gave away that the scum knew about Suburban losing his powers. Luckily, I don't really give a shit about texcat. If Idle thinks he can make a grand total of ten posts over the first two Days, then taunt us like he's made some sort of grand master scum play, I say just ignore texcat and let the scum waste a kill on her. They're going to have to eventually, since they're as much at risk of her being a PFK as we are. On the other hand, Suburban could be scum and the entire kill thing could be a set-up between him and Idle to make texcat look bad. So we have... - Doctor who has to kill herself for a one-time only protection
- Doctor who roleblocks, but loses his powers if he gets targetted for a kill
- Investigator that only gets names
- Investigator that only gets scum/not-scum
- Compulsory vig
- At least three vanillas with no indication of powers
So far the only really good pro-town power is Nanook's one-shot recruitment. On the flip side, the only power we seem to know from scum is they get an extra kill at the expense of revealing someone is scum. My guess is that there are two scum left besides Idle, possibly three. They wouldn't have used his power unless they were confident they had a good handle on the game. I'm going to reiterate that I think a mass claim is a good idea at this point. I'm also going to reiterate that people need to talk more, otherwise I'd say let texcat loose among the lurkers. Why do I think a mass claim is a good idea? Because honestly I think it would cause people to play harder. Right now we have a lot of people coasting...most of the unclaimed are ones who don't post a lot. I think having everyone claim would at least give us more information on those with low post counts, and put them under scrutiny. And at Day Five, any powers that are beneficial to town should start being revealed soon anyway...aside from Doctors but it seems our two Doctor roles have already been neutralized and didn't help at protecting anyway. Also, we've lost four Investigative roles so really, what in the hell powers could be left? We can at least trust that scathach is not-scum for the moment since that's the only result we got from Lightfoot. ---- Here's the one thing that's bugging me. And it's really bugging me. Idle is clearly on a manic tear of just trying to be as annoying and confusing as possible until he's lynched. If that is so, and I'm asking this because I had some time to think about it: Why hasn't he voted and unvoted and set off SBrown's device yet?Furthermore. Why doesn't SBrOwn seem to be worried that a renegade scum could set off her device, but actually seems to be more worried about Meeko unvoting instead?Just...curious. Because that was one of the first instinctual things I was worried about when I was first strapped to a device: an outed scum detonating a townie's device on his own. Why hasn't Idle even threatened to do that to SBrOwn? I mean, that's what I would do if I were in that position.
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Total Ullz on Apr 2, 2012 14:01:28 GMT -5
As for Idle, just ignore him. He's not going to shut up, especially if he's getting under anyone's skin. Careful He might start to post random wiki-articles Now that would be a debacle
|
|
|
Post by texcat on Apr 2, 2012 14:33:57 GMT -5
0 posts Today 1. peekercpa, Gad's msg2 posts 2. Pollux Oil, Lady Shiva, vanilla0 posts 3. Nanook, Harley Quinn, Special (recruiter)0 posts 5. scathach, Not scum1 post 7. sinjin 6 posts 8. Total Ullz, mason-like claim with Inner9 posts 9. SBrOwn 2 posts 10. gnarlycharly 8 posts 11. Suburban Plankton, Mr. Freeze, protector and blocker2 posts 13. Gadarene, Gad's msg23 posts 17. Idle Thoughts, Poison Ivy, Night revenge killer (50%), Huntress4 posts 18. BillMc 2 posts 19. texcat, Ra's Al Ghul, Killing23 posts 22. Meeko 1 post 25. Mahaloth, Solomon Grundy, Protective1 post 28. Hal Briston 15. Pleonast, The Joker Killing6. Special Ed, Batman, Special4. Merestil Haye, The Penguin, Special20. guiri, Talia Al Ghul, Special26. astral rejection, The Ratcatcher, Investigative14. Drain Bead, The Riddler, Investigative27. Archangel, CALENDAR MAN, Vanilla31. Inner Stickler, ALEXEI ABRAMOVICI , Alignment-Based23. askthepizzaguy, Catwoman, (Special) Role-blocker12. Rysto, Hugo Strange, investigative21. Silver Jan, The Scarecrow , Name investigator30. Chronos, Killer Moth, Vanilla29. dirx/SisC, Victor Zsasz, Killing16. Cometothe...Cookies, Firefly, Protective kerosener24. Lightfoot, Robin redacted, Investigative(scum or not scum)So, we have yet to hear from peeker, Sinjin, Scathach, or Nanook. Both peeker and Gad have been relatively quiet since peeker's announcement that Gad is not absolutely confirmed. Meeko has posted more than a few times, but it was not very illuminating. I can do that. I did not target anyone last night. Idle seems to be taking credit for all 3 attacks last night, although he claims that mystery scum #2 only stripped Suburban of his powers, and did not attempt to kill him. Has anyone else had their powers stripped? I suspect that scum did try to kill Suburban and are lying about it. How did scum suddenly come into all these powers? I suspect that Idle's outing himself as scum gave the scum more powers that just a one-time additional night kill. A one for one trade is not really a very good deal for scum, is it? I see only 7 unclaimed players in my list above. Have I missed anyone? Since we have already uncovered two protective roles, I agree that it might be time for a mass claim. I don't think it can hurt much now.
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on Apr 2, 2012 14:38:35 GMT -5
Boy aren't we a talkative bunch Today.
I put together a list of the remaining players, in general order of "how confident we can reasonably be of their identity"
Idle - Mod confirmed Scum
mahaloth - originally 3rd Party, now Town, recruited by Nanook. Two-time Night Kill immunity Nanook - Town Recruiter, now Vanilla Total - Inner's Mason partner. Was protected by Cookies
peeker - Town "message sender", now Vanilla, confirmed by Gadarene. Was protected by Cookies scathach - "Not Scum" according to LightFoot
Suburban - claimed Town Doctor/Blocker, now Vanilla texcat - claimed Town Vig. Was protected by Cookies
Gadarene - claimed Town, originally cleared as Town by peeker, later rescinded
Pollux - no role info, has a Device (counts down each time he votes) SBrOwn - no role info, has a Device (counts up each time someone unvotes) Hal - no role info, has a Device (unknown function). Was protected by Cookies Bill - no role info, has a Device (unknown function)
Meeko - no claim other than 'non-vanilla'
sinjin- no info
I notice that none of the players who have had Devices attached to them has made any sort of claim. I'm not sure if that says anything about these players, or if it's significant that the device Planter has avoided anyone who has made a role claim. I think there has been a tendency to believe that these people are 'non threatening'. Hal is the only one of them who has received any substantial votes, receiving at least one vote each Day; Pollux, SBrOwn, and Bill together have garnered exactly 4 votes all game, and two of those were SBrOwn voting and unvoting himself.
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on Apr 2, 2012 14:42:46 GMT -5
NETA:
I had missed Pollux claim, but since he's claiming Vanilla it doesn't change much. I also neglected to include gnarly somehow, who should be at the bottom of my list next to sinjin, under the 'no info at all' section.
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on Apr 2, 2012 14:54:12 GMT -5
There is another possbility to explain the 'extra' death last Night.
Cookies might have activated her protective devices, killing herself in the process. If that's the case, there is nothing unexplained.
Cookies sacrificed herself Scum killed LightFoot Idle attempted to kill me and failed
The order of the last two would be unknown, but I think unimportant. Just to clarify; the loss of my powers was a direct consequence of being targeted for a kill. There is no evidence of a separate 'power neutralizing' role here, unless I was targeted by both a Killer and a Power Stealer last Night, which frankly I find hard to believe.
So far we have had nobody who claims to have smelled kerosene this morning. If we had, it would be direct evidence that Cookies did not sacrifice herself, so she must have been killed.
Unfortunately, the converse is not true. The fact that she didn't place kerosene does not necessarily mean she set off her 'bombs'. From the rules:so she could have been killed before having a chance to do anything if Night Kills take precedence over Planting Protective Devices.
|
|
|
Post by Pollux Oil on Apr 2, 2012 15:15:12 GMT -5
I did not target anyone last night. Idle seems to be taking credit for all 3 attacks last night, although he claims that mystery scum #2 only stripped Suburban of his powers, and did not attempt to kill him. Has anyone else had their powers stripped? I suspect that scum did try to kill Suburban and are lying about it. How did scum suddenly come into all these powers? I suspect that Idle's outing himself as scum gave the scum more powers that just a one-time additional night kill. A one for one trade is not really a very good deal for scum, is it? If it was unblockable it could have been worth it. A double kill where one of their kills can't be stopped by a doctor could be very useful to scum. It's not as useful if their numbers are low and would have been a lot more beneficial if three scum hadn't died already. If the scum have an investigator, they could have discovered Suburban was a blocktor and wanted to ensure his death, only to be foiled by his innate kill protection. There is another possbility to explain the 'extra' death last Night. Cookies might have activated her protective devices, killing herself in the process. If that's the case, there is nothing unexplained. That's true. Cookies could have detonated herself under the suspicion that she was probably going to be targeted anyway. From her talk at Night it sounded like she was going to try and switch her devices off texcat first, though, but that could have been misdirection to try and bait the scum into targeting someone she was going to protect.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Apr 2, 2012 15:36:22 GMT -5
c) You claim that the scum removed the powers of Plankton -- you originally said he was 3rd party, now you say he is pfk #82, and two posts later, 3rd party again. Am I missing something here? I always thought PFK WAS Third Party. I use the two interchangably. I'm pretty sure you're the one in the wrong here. PFK = Third Party. Anyway, your A through D is all correct. I don't think your E is since I know one of the scum targeted Suburban last Night to take away his powers and.............LO AND BEHOLD.......his powers are taken away. So what else am I supposed to surmise with that?
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Apr 2, 2012 15:38:40 GMT -5
Idle. Shut the fuck up already. Yes. I don't give a shit that it's your board. SHUT THE FUCK UP. Sorry, I'm going to make sure you all have the facts straight. Not going to let Bill post giving totally wrong info (Like the fact that I said, ANYWHERE, that we attempted to kill Suburban Plankton---which he did---and which we (the scum) hadn't). In fact, read my post above...with Bill trying to say I'm calling him different things by referring to him both as a PFK AND Third Party. Uh, duh! PFKs ARE Third Party. Am I in the Twilight Zone? How is that an inconsistency?
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Apr 2, 2012 15:39:27 GMT -5
About now would be a good time to hear from peeker, Nanook, and scathach. As for Idle, just ignore him. He's not going to shut up, especially if he's getting under anyone's skin. After all, that's the sole reason he's posting at this point. Just remember that we can have absolutely zero confidence in anything he says Today, and don't worry about him. Of course the PFK wants everyone to ignore me.Town, you'll do well not to trust him, believe me. We took away his powers for a reason.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Apr 2, 2012 15:43:27 GMT -5
Huntress is my NAME...not Poison Ivy. You have it down as a role for some reason.
|
|
|
Post by SBrOwn on Apr 2, 2012 15:50:13 GMT -5
Furthermore. Why doesn't SBrOwn seem to be worried that a renegade scum could set off her device, but actually seems to be more worried about Meeko unvoting instead?Just...curious. Because that was one of the first instinctual things I was worried about when I was first strapped to a device: an outed scum detonating a townie's device on his own. Why hasn't Idle even threatened to do that to SBrOwn? I mean, that's what I would do if I were in that position. You dick. That's not cool at ALL. Why would you even think of saying that sort of thing? I hadn't even considered anyone would be that scummy to do that behavior. Really? What happened to YOUR saying you were going to detonate your device today? I don't see you being so noble anymore- instead you're basically pushing me out there to be the volunteer now instead of you? That's not noble or respectful or cool cool at ALL. And I don't buy your "the silent people are the ones who need to claim" argument at all. Either you're just really frustrated or somethings turned you, Pollux, because your ideas are just not making sense toDay. Also, Suburban Plankton- I'm a girl. Herself.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Apr 2, 2012 15:53:57 GMT -5
There is another possbility to explain the 'extra' death last Night. Cookies might have activated her protective devices, killing herself in the process. If that's the case, there is nothing unexplained. Cookies sacrificed herself Scum killed LightFoot Idle attempted to kill me and failed The bullshit is strong in this one. You know damn right well that's not what happened. Here, I'll be nice and put the cookies on the lower shelf for you all (save for Suburban, because he already knows): Scum kill was Lightfoot. I killed Cookies (with my "one-off kill someone and be revealed" power) Investigative scum investigated (Ha, like I'm going to tell you this) Power-stealing scum stole power from Suburban Plankton due to us learning he was PFK the Night before. No kill attempt happened on Suburban. He's just SAYING that as an excuse to why he lost his powers. For the record: Night One, power-stealer attempted to steal Chronos' power due to thinking he was the strongest player in the game (but we failed for some reason--we now know he had no power to steal). Night Two, power-stealer tries to steal Lightfoot's power, but is blocked. Night Three, power-stealer tries to steal Silver Jan's power due to us thinking she may be investigating me that Night (she made a post that said she was going to investigate someone who already claimed "for what good it would do [her]" that Day. We worried it would be ME since I had already claimed by then AND that she listed me as someone she was suspicious of, and we succeed. She's dead the next morning anyway. Night Four, power-stealer steals Suburban's power since we found he was a PFK (via our investigator) on Night Three. Obviously I'm leaving things out. I can't tell you EVERYTHING and ALL OUR HISTORY. But that's a good amount that hopefully explains things better.
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on Apr 2, 2012 15:54:23 GMT -5
About now would be a good time to hear from peeker, Nanook, and scathach. As for Idle, just ignore him. He's not going to shut up, especially if he's getting under anyone's skin. After all, that's the sole reason he's posting at this point. Just remember that we can have absolutely zero confidence in anything he says Today, and don't worry about him. Of course the PFK wants everyone to ignore me.Town, you'll do well not to trust him, believe me. We took away his powers for a reason. <sized down for readability>Hey, at least you're posting something. And you're doing so in hopes of furthering your team's cause. I can respect that. It's more than most people are doing Today. But I can't help my mind going back to this post from Day 4: I assume nothing happens, Suburban. Would you like me to actually ask the mod, though? Seemed to me to be pretty clear, that it's just a one shot thing. IMHO, anything more than just once would be too overpowered. And again, the way I read it, if I kill my attacker, how do they kill me? It looks obvious to me that if I'm successful, I live...and if I'm not, I don't. So where's your confusion over these things I seem to see as simple explained things? Not to mention, you think I'm scum, huh? Even though you were voting for me yesterDay....after...hmmm.....who was it....... OH YES! PIZZAGUY voted for me. He was the first vote on me, too. So you think that scum would try to bus scum and be hopeful that a bandwagon starts on fellow scum when they've already lost THREE of their members? Sorry, does not compute. And I know fully well that scum will easily vote for each other in order to gain Town cred... but when THREE of their members have already fallen? That'd be pretty stupid scum, let me tell you. Why can't it be that the scum (aka, pizza), worried they'd not be able to get me out at Night without losing YET ANOTHER of their number, were trying to get me out in the Day, with a lynch? That makes MORE sense, I'd think. Why do you always seem to pick on me in games? More often than not, you always wind up voting for me..and you always wind up being wrong.* *assuming you're wrong here and not just scum. But like I said above....I'm betting it was scum wanting to try to get me LYNCHED in the Day rather than attempt to kill me at Night....something you seem to be doing right here. <bolding mine>All I can say is "Ha ha...liar, liar, pants on fire...I win, you lose, I rule, you drool...I found you out*, and you couldn't even kill me properly!" * finally...I think every other time you and I have gotten into it with each other we wound up both being town...
|
|
|
Post by SBrOwn on Apr 2, 2012 15:58:26 GMT -5
Night Two, power-stealer tries to steal Lightfoot's power, but is blocked. Are you smearing Gadarene here since he was blocked N2? Bah, forget this stuff. I'm going to play this game the way I know how- Analysis and Voting records. If Idle is scum, I can go back through the voting records and fill in the blanks and the data points. Just listening to all the talking that's going on is useless right now. As long as the noise is out there, it's just going to smear everyone and frustrate us all.
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on Apr 2, 2012 16:02:30 GMT -5
Furthermore. Why doesn't SBrOwn seem to be worried that a renegade scum could set off her device, but actually seems to be more worried about Meeko unvoting instead?Just...curious. Because that was one of the first instinctual things I was worried about when I was first strapped to a device: an outed scum detonating a townie's device on his own. Why hasn't Idle even threatened to do that to SBrOwn? I mean, that's what I would do if I were in that position. You dick. That's not cool at ALL. Why would you even think of saying that sort of thing? I hadn't even considered anyone would be that scummy to do that behavior. Really? What happened to YOUR saying you were going to detonate your device today? I don't see you being so noble anymore- instead you're basically pushing me out there to be the volunteer now instead of you? That's not noble or respectful or cool cool at ALL. And I don't buy your "the silent people are the ones who need to claim" argument at all. Either you're just really frustrated or somethings turned you, Pollux, because your ideas are just not making sense toDay. Also, Suburban Plankton- I'm a girl. Herself. Good point regarding Pollux. He originally said "I'm the only one right now that has control over how the device counts down, I may just go ahead and claim and then count my device down to 0 if everyone is okay with that." ( Day 4 Post 50). Later he amended that to say "Yeah, as Cookies said, I think I'm gonna try it on Day 5, provided I live that long ( Day 4 Post 176). And Today he seems to have forgotten all about it. And sorry for the gender confusion.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Apr 2, 2012 16:02:37 GMT -5
Oh ho ho...look who's starting to believe me now! How about trying to believe that Suburban is PFK now? And yes, Gad is the last scum. Lynch him. Lynch me first, though.
|
|
|
Post by BillMc on Apr 2, 2012 16:05:21 GMT -5
Am I missing something here? I always thought PFK WAS Third Party. I use the two interchangably. I'm pretty sure you're the one in the wrong here. PFK = Third Party. Yes, you are missing the rules - or just confusing yourself with your fabrications The Set-UpThis is a closed set-up. It may, or may not, be a no-vanilla set-up. Some roles may or may not initially appear to be vanilla but have hidden or unlockable abilities/quirks. At any given time, each role will have one of four different alignments, as follows: Town Players all have the following win condition: "All Scum and PFK (if any) are neutralized." Scum Players all have the following win condition: "Scum control the voting and all malicious third parties (PFK) are neutralized." Third Party Players are players that are neither Town- nor Scum-aligned but are not a threat to the win condition of either side; the specifics of each win condition may vary, but third party players can win along with either Town or Scum. PFK Players are players that are neither Town nor Scum and ARE a threat to the win condition of either side. A PFK player may or may not be able to win alongside some third party players, but if a PFK player wins, then all Town and Scum players do not.
|
|
|
Post by texcat on Apr 2, 2012 16:09:45 GMT -5
First a quick glance at The RulesNight Three, power-stealer tries to steal Silver Jan's power due to us thinking she may be investigating me that Night (she made a post that said she was going to investigate someone who already claimed "for what good it would do [her]" that Day. We worried it would be ME since I had already claimed by then AND that she listed me as someone she was suspicious of, and we succeed. She's dead the next morning anyway. On night 3, I killed Rysto, SisC claimed to have killed Chronos, leaving the scum with SilverJan's kill. Did you try to steal her power before or after you killed her? This is not adding up, Idle.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Apr 2, 2012 16:12:58 GMT -5
Am I missing something here? I always thought PFK WAS Third Party. I use the two interchangably. I'm pretty sure you're the one in the wrong here. PFK = Third Party. Yes, you are missing the rules - or just confusing yourself with your fabrications The Set-UpThis is a closed set-up. It may, or may not, be a no-vanilla set-up. Some roles may or may not initially appear to be vanilla but have hidden or unlockable abilities/quirks. At any given time, each role will have one of four different alignments, as follows: Town Players all have the following win condition: "All Scum and PFK (if any) are neutralized." Scum Players all have the following win condition: "Scum control the voting and all malicious third parties (PFK) are neutralized." Third Party Players are players that are neither Town- nor Scum-aligned but are not a threat to the win condition of either side; the specifics of each win condition may vary, but third party players can win along with either Town or Scum. PFK Players are players that are neither Town nor Scum and ARE a threat to the win condition of either side. A PFK player may or may not be able to win alongside some third party players, but if a PFK player wins, then all Town and Scum players do not. My mistake then. Suburban is a PFK. We got told PFK...but I always thought PFK was Third Party. I did not read the rules* *I'm scum, why would I? I was skimming like a motherfucker, too, before I was found out.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Apr 2, 2012 16:15:49 GMT -5
First a quick glance at The RulesNight Three, power-stealer tries to steal Silver Jan's power due to us thinking she may be investigating me that Night (she made a post that said she was going to investigate someone who already claimed "for what good it would do [her]" that Day. We worried it would be ME since I had already claimed by then AND that she listed me as someone she was suspicious of, and we succeed. She's dead the next morning anyway. On night 3, I killed Rysto, SisC claimed to have killed Chronos, leaving the scum with SilverJan's kill. Did you try to steal her power before or after you killed her? This is not adding up, Idle. WE killed Chronos, and were told we did (because we thought he was the strongest player in the game and because our stealing his power failed). So unless there was some crazy redirection things going on that Night, I don't know how to explain it.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Apr 2, 2012 16:18:57 GMT -5
You know what I'm starting to think...
I'm starting to wonder if our power-stealer don't have a secret (unknown to him and us) power where he attempts to kill the person (also) he's stealing the power from.
Because that would explain Silver Jan's death on the Night we tried to steal the power from her....and it would explain why Suburban Plankton is getting the message someone tried to kill him (AND that his powers were stolen).
|
|
|
Post by texcat on Apr 2, 2012 16:22:32 GMT -5
LOL. I guess editing is a scum tell.
|
|
|
Post by Pollux Oil on Apr 2, 2012 16:23:02 GMT -5
What happened to YOUR saying you were going to detonate your device today? I don't see you being so noble anymore- instead you're basically pushing me out there to be the volunteer now instead of you? That's not noble or respectful or cool cool at ALL. I notice Idle is focused more on obfuscating everything else than addressing what I said. Your sudden super-defensiveness and calling me out is a complete 180 in your behavior so far. I think I'm right. Everybody watch SBrOwn now.And to address your and Suburban's concerns. Vote: Idle Thoughts (in case my first one didn't count for wrong formatting) Unvote: Idle Thoughts Vote: SBrOwn Unvote: SBrOwn Vote: Idle Thoughts That should put me at zero, right? Or should I vote and unvote a few more times just to make sure.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Apr 2, 2012 16:23:17 GMT -5
I figure, why not? I'm outted anyway..hah.
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on Apr 2, 2012 16:38:57 GMT -5
What happened to YOUR saying you were going to detonate your device today? I don't see you being so noble anymore- instead you're basically pushing me out there to be the volunteer now instead of you? That's not noble or respectful or cool cool at ALL. I notice Idle is focused more on obfuscating everything else than addressing what I said. Your sudden super-defensiveness and calling me out is a complete 180 in your behavior so far. I think I'm right. Everybody watch SBrOwn now.And to address your and Suburban's concerns. Vote: Idle Thoughts (in case my first one didn't count for wrong formatting) Unvote: Idle Thoughts Vote: SBrOwn Unvote: SBrOwn Vote: Idle Thoughts That should put me at zero, right? Or should I vote and unvote a few more times just to make sure. Dun Dun DUNNN!!! That ought to do it, by my count. And I believe SBrOwn's device should read "-34", shouldn't it? story, can we have an update?
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on Apr 2, 2012 16:41:19 GMT -5
I'm starting to wonder if our power-stealer don't have a secret (unknown to him and us) power where he attempts to kill the person (also) he's stealing the power from. So you're proposing that one of the Scum has a power that is not only a Secret from the Town...and is not only a secret from the rest of the Scum...but is also a secret from himself? I believe that would be a first... Good try, though
|
|
|
Post by sinjin on Apr 2, 2012 16:49:51 GMT -5
@SBr0wn: Why do you continue to say if Idle is scum. He has been mod-confirmed as scum? Why are you angry at at Pollux for stating the obvious?
@billmc: I did nothing last night and got no message that I was encased in ice or blocked.
vote Idle
|
|
|
Post by sinjin on Apr 2, 2012 16:55:26 GMT -5
Gah!
vote Idle
|
|