|
Post by Archangel on May 13, 2011 13:39:02 GMT -5
NETA: And, it was me and Sister Coyote over there. She voted him first, but I argued with him and pinpointed why he pinged me.
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on May 13, 2011 13:40:20 GMT -5
What was that again? You went to the mod to have it changed YOU WERE FRUSTRATED (and probably unsettled that no-one missed you yet) I'm not throwing rocks at you, just trying to keep you honest. Again, I was frustrated at the REACTION to my post restriction, not at the restriction itself. Specifically at the fact that three people agreed with the insanely stupid idea that I should stay quiet the entire day to prove that I didn't get a penalty. There is an untruth. Even if part of the claim is true OBVIOUSLY Moley WAS frustrated and asked the mod to change his restriction for D1. See below Ok then. Let's begin. First thing, Sis C has agreed to lift my post restriction for the first round temporarily, on account of nobody's showing any interest in why on earth a usually over-active player hasn't said a word since Night Zero. And this occurred to nobody? I've had a first-day exception because in three real-life days, not a single person noticed I was missing. Or cared where I was. ~~snip~~It's not a penalty I'm worried about, it's not being able to talk. Having my post restriction out in the open guarantees that people at least know what I'm up against. You could say I could wait until Day 2 (or Day 3, or Day 4, or whatever). What if I've noticed something significant to a close lynch, but I can't speak and nobody knows why? ~~snip~~ ~~snip~~1) I claim to the mod that my post restriction is unfair on Day One because nobody's mentioned me. ~snip~ Nobody has produced any reason why Sis. C would refuse to temporarily lift my post restriction when I haven't been able to post a single thing because of it in the first three days of the game, and it looks seriously likely that I might not be able to post anything for the rest of the day. You don't think that a mod would consider it unfair that a player hasn't been able to post anything for over half a game-Day? Not going to “quote” this one. It will confuse the page idlemafia.com/index.cgi?action=gotopost&board=woo&thread=1626&post=78126Does that not sound frustrated to you? I can't see why Moley would deny the obvious
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on May 13, 2011 14:03:05 GMT -5
Part II okay, after trying to work on my analysis.... I gave myself a headache and realized that I couldn't really do it... well, that was helpful ~~snip~~ Heck, I'm not even sure who half of everyone is in here... Maybe that's why I'm so lost in this game That may be where you are making your mistake. Prior gameplay/character/ what you chatted about on FB/etc. Is not productive when determining what a person is doing in ‘this game’. Putting in my two cents on Captain, I have to agree with the mob. If Captain could post the PM for his purchased vote, then he could post his PM. Not alot from colby for so late in the Day I’ve already stated my thoughts on RystoVoting one of them at this time will not change toDay’s outcome but I wanted to get these thoughts in print. Fluiddruid is either a 3rd party or a liar (or both). Seasoned player or no, I remember the first time I was given a role I asked every question I could think of .(many were replied with “no Comment” but I did ASK them) No matter which I feel my vote is best placed here: Vote: Fluiddruid
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on May 13, 2011 14:04:28 GMT -5
I see I missed almost 2 pages while I was composing. Back to see if anyone made my comments redundant
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on May 13, 2011 14:32:19 GMT -5
There is a plausible explanation for why the vote buyer picked Pinkies; tell me if this makes sense. The penalty (two votes) would have little impact unless the controlled voter was a likely Lynch candidate, as Pinkies is. This would imply that the vote buyer would pick someone under heavy suspicion. This explanation only makes sense if the Vote Buyer knows ahead of time: - Exactly what mechanism will be used to record the 'bought' vote
- Exactly what the penalty would be for the 'buyee' failing to comply with the Mod's rules regarding the bought vote
I've never played in a game with such a role before, so I may be mistaken here but I don't think that either of those are a given. I don't think we can use this line of reasoning to explain why Pinkies would have been the Vote Buyer's target.
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on May 13, 2011 14:39:00 GMT -5
Pinkies is playing pretty much the usual way he plays when he is vanilla, and his play style is anti-town. The fact that he has an apparent forced vote for archangel is a null tell wrt to archangels alignment Fluid appears to be withholding something, her story doesnt quite seem right - she says she has no knowledge of a penalty vote against her. So if the mod is not saying it is a penalty vote, then that would give us a 4th role that is apparently tampering with the vote - whoever forced Pinkies (if truthful) - Fluid's role - SP's role - whoever put the extra vote on Fluid It just doesn't scan - too many people capable of apparently influencing the vote Vote: vote fluid The apparent number of 'vote influencing' roles is much greater than in a 'normal' game, but I don't think it's out of line her. recall that in the rules thread SisC told us "There are undoubtedly going to be Voting Shenanigans during this game" And if we assume all of the claims so far have been truthful, there are really only two 'vote changing' roles in play at the moment. The extra vote on fluiddruid is a penalty vote for failing to act last Night, and my uncounted vote was a 'penalty' for failing to comply with my voting restriction. If we had all played by the rules, there would have been only 2 'oddities' instead of 4.
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on May 13, 2011 15:04:05 GMT -5
Current (Unchecked) vote count:
Captain Pinkies (9,9)*: Special Ed [4], Suburban Plankton [47,198,209], septimus [88], Meeko [156], LightFoot [161, 264], JustBeingGinger [228], Storyteller [269], guiri [304], CatInaSuit [317], colby11 [341] Fluiddruid (5,4): Archangel [30,203,246], gnarlycharlie [227], BillMc [343], LightFoot[363] Archangel (2,3): CatInaSuit [26,317], metallicsquink [37], Captain Pinkies [90] Paranoia/Ma'at (0,1): colby11 [176,313] JustBeingGinger (1,1): Honest Moley [263] colby11 (1,0): guiri (1,1): Rysto [321] gnarlycharlie (0,1): Archangel [203,246] CatInaSuit (0,1): septimus [60,88] Special Ed (0,1): Suburban Plankton [198,209]
With these votes Captain Pinkies will be lynched.
Please note any corrections.
ToDay will end in approximately five hours.
|
|
|
Post by metallicsquink on May 13, 2011 15:11:03 GMT -5
<snip> And if we assume all of the claims so far have been truthful, there are really only two 'vote changing' roles in play at the moment. The extra vote on fluiddruid is a penalty vote for failing to act last Night, and my uncounted vote was a 'penalty' for failing to comply with my voting restriction. If we had all played by the rules, there would have been only 2 'oddities' instead of 4. No one has confirmed (or not) that the extra vote for fluiddruid is a penalty (I'm still not sure why she won't ask the mod). It's possible that the extra vote on fluiddruid is a silent vote. I played in a game with that mechanism once (House - one player could only vote by sending a PM to the mod. That player ended up being a scum godfather, I believe.)
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on May 13, 2011 15:28:36 GMT -5
<snip> And if we assume all of the claims so far have been truthful, there are really only two 'vote changing' roles in play at the moment. The extra vote on fluiddruid is a penalty vote for failing to act last Night, and my uncounted vote was a 'penalty' for failing to comply with my voting restriction. If we had all played by the rules, there would have been only 2 'oddities' instead of 4. No one has confirmed (or not) that the extra vote for fluiddruid is a penalty (I'm still not sure why she won't ask the mod). It's possible that the extra vote on fluiddruid is a silent vote. I played in a game with that mechanism once (House - one player could only vote by sending a PM to the mod. That player ended up being a scum godfather, I believe.) You are quite correct. Note that I began that paragraph with "And if we assume all of the claims so far have been truthful". As far as the actual veracity of those claims, mine is the only one I trust completely at this point. I believe that fluiddruid is hiding something, but I'm not certain what or how much. Pinkies might well be telling the truth about his vote being controlled, but I think his reluctance to make anything remotely approaching a full claim speaks to his being Scum in either case.
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on May 13, 2011 15:32:19 GMT -5
NETA: After posting my reply there, it occurs to me that I might have failed to understand your point. I think now you were specifically pointing out that the 'penalty vote' on fluiddurid is not necessarily a 'penalty vote', so we really don't know where it came from.
In that case, you are still (again?) correct. fluiddruid did say she assumes it is a penalty vote, but on reread I see that she did not claim to know that it is.
|
|
|
Post by guiri on May 13, 2011 15:33:00 GMT -5
On that note: PinkiesI can't see any Town motivation for how he plays in general and this game is no different. First of all, this is completely backwards. Looking for scum motivation is far more important than finding town motivation. Second of all, as you say Pinkies' play is always bizarre, so this isn't a reliable tell for him at all. I might be fooled into thinking that this is just a vote out of frustration, but the fact that you've invoked motivations tells me that you're trying to look like you're building a case when you're really not, which ping the hell out of me. I was making a general comment on Pinkies' playstyle. How hard was it to confirm receipt of your role PM? How hard was it to add "I'M" to your "TOWN" post? How hard was it to explain your vote restriction when first asked? And still no claim? "I'm planning on participating" "I'm ready to RUMMBBLE" Well that didn't happen either. More of the same. How has Pinkies displayed scum motivation by doing this? I'm really suspicious that while ostensibly building a case against Pinkies, really you've just listed off a series of really frustrating things that Pinkies has done. What's the scum motivation for: - no posts till 15 minutes before Day end? Avoid suspicion, a sufficient number of players will say: "that's just Pinkies, he always does that". Actually contributing would draw attention to him for being out of character - posting "TOWN" rather than "I'M TOWN"? Avoid being caught by the lie detector - being vague about his claimed vote restriction? Create confusion, possibly try to find who caused it based on their interactions with him and their reactions to his claim - not claiming? - avoid getting caught out again, encourage players to think he may be hiding something important - not making cases, no commentary? Faking suspicion leads to slips, unwanted attention and discussion - promising participation? Buy time, temporary reprieve from suspicion/accusations The main reason for my vote came in the part you snipped: Of the 3 vote leaders, I think Story makes a good argument and I agree Pinkies is the best candidate: I think that you're trying to get people annoyed at Pinkies so they'll vote him off. I think he's done a good enough job on his own. I doubt my vote, the 7th, had or will have much of an effect on anyone.
|
|
|
Post by Dirx on May 13, 2011 16:41:55 GMT -5
I think the bandwagon on Pinkies is a little over the top, and guiri, I think you're reading motivation in his actions that isn't there. It's a compelling argument, but I don't think it's the case here.
My vote, I guess, is between fluiddruid and Meeko. Meeko's been lurking and laying down crapass votes. To me, that has Scum written all over it. As for fluid... I'm often antsy about claimed 3rd parties. There's nothing to prove that she's telling the truth about her role. Then again, 3rd party/pfk are great bandwagons for scum to push. Let Town spend a lynch on them instead of hunting scum, rather than use up their own kill when they can try for a town power or something instead. So, I say A) let scum deal with her, and B) take note of those voting for her/pushing for her lynch.
So, with that, I will:
Vote: Meeko
...again. If his play had changed since Yesterday, I'd consider looking elsewhere. As it is, he's just done more of the same stuff I voted him for already, so I feel good about this vote.
If I had more time, I'd look into the fluiddruid voters to see if there's anything there, but this idea didn't occur to me until basically just now.
|
|
|
Post by metallicsquink on May 13, 2011 16:49:26 GMT -5
NETA: After posting my reply there, it occurs to me that I might have failed to understand your point. I think now you were specifically pointing out that the 'penalty vote' on fluiddurid is not necessarily a 'penalty vote', so we really don't know where it came from. In that case, you are still (again?) correct. fluiddruid did say she assumes it is a penalty vote, but on reread I see that she did not claim to know that it is. Yes, that is what I wanted to clarify. Assumptions are dangerous and I just wanted us to be aware that there are other options for the penalty vote (even if I failed to see them earlier ).
|
|
|
Post by metallicsquink on May 13, 2011 16:56:55 GMT -5
NETA: After posting my reply there, it occurs to me that I might have failed to understand your point. I think now you were specifically pointing out that the 'penalty vote' on fluiddurid is not necessarily a 'penalty vote', so we really don't know where it came from. In that case, you are still (again?) correct. fluiddruid did say she assumes it is a penalty vote, but on reread I see that she did not claim to know that it is. Yes, that is what I wanted to clarify. Assumptions are dangerous and I just wanted us to be aware that there are other options for the penalty vote (even if I failed to see them earlier ). And I just did it again (called it a penalty vote)!
|
|
Merestil Haye
FGM
Grudge Keeper
[on:Slumming it in the Middle-Earth][of:In the halls of Manw
Posts: 1,077
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Merestil Haye on May 13, 2011 17:20:22 GMT -5
Yesterday, I vote d for Fluiddruid – see D01.304. Since then, of course, Fluid has claimed to be a third party non winstealing role. I believe she's not Town; no self-respecting Townie would lie about that. The question is, is she what she claims, or Mafia, or a PFK (a win-stealing unaligned player)? I have to say I don't like the claim. Something feels off about it. The role names she ascribed to herself (Mad Bomber and Politician) don't match the conventional meanings. A Mad Bomber “tags” one player each Night, and wins when the number of living players tagged reaches a set percentage. A Politician buys votes, much in the way that Captain Pinkies claims he has been affected Today. Fluiddruid's claimed role matches neither of those descriptions. Thus, especially after Dr Seuss Mafia 1, I have question marks over that. If the title is correct, I would expect Fluid to have to “mark” players at Night. Perhaps the vote is SisterC's way of alerting us to the fact there is a tagger floating around? I agree with Dirx that, by and large, it's better to go after Mafia with the lynch rope rather than a PFK. However, there are two circumstances when it's acceptable. One is when the PFK player is on the verge of stealing a win. (I'm looking at you, Rysto.) The other is early in the game, when the likelihood is that we still have some mislynches available. Lynching the PFK then avoids a problem at endgame if both are close to reaching their wincon, and all the Town can do is choose which side wins. The problem with unaligned players (players who are not Town or Mafia) is that the Town can't necessarily trust the claim to be Third party (ie not winstealing) and may have to deal with the claimant in the way of mafia – hang 'em high. The other thing that is bothering me about Fluiddruid's claim is her failure to ask questions of Sister C about the parts of the role she claims not to understand. Most mods are quite happy to answer questions from a player about that player's role, and the more complex the role the more likely this will be needed.. Fluid's reluctance to do so suggests that it is a fake role, and therefore Sister C won't answer questions on it. I've been going back and forth on whether to revote Fluiddruid or not, but that brngs me down in avour. Vote: Fluiddruid 1In that game, Sister C labelled a player's role “paranoid doc.” The power in this case varied in one important particular from the normal meaning of that role title in this group; instead of Night protection and roleblock simultaneously, the power protected at Night but stole the player's vote the following Day. When the player claimed, there was a lot of puzzlement over how the power worked. See the endgame for Sister C's confession.
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on May 13, 2011 17:31:48 GMT -5
Current (Unchecked) vote count:
Captain Pinkies (9,9)*: Special Ed [4], Suburban Plankton [47,198,209], septimus [88], Meeko [156], LightFoot [161, 264], JustBeingGinger [228], Storyteller [269], guiri [304], CatInaSuit [317], colby11 [341] Fluiddruid (6,5): Archangel [30,203,246], gnarlycharlie [227], BillMc [343], LightFoot[363], Merestil Haye [374] Archangel (2,3): CatInaSuit [26,317], metallicsquink [37], Captain Pinkies [90] Paranoia (0,1): colby11 [176,313] JustBeingGinger (1,1): Honest Moley [263] colby11 (1,0): guiri (1,1): Rysto [321] Meeko (1,1): Dirx [371] gnarlycharlie (0,1): Archangel [203,246] CatInaSuit (0,1): septimus [60,88] Special Ed (0,1): Suburban Plankton [198,209]
With these votes Captain Pinkies will be lynched.
Please note any corrections.
ToDay will end in approximately two and one-half hours.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Pinkies on May 13, 2011 18:34:11 GMT -5
just to show that I was not lying and well to seal my fate.....
Unvote: archangel
Vote: Special ED
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on May 13, 2011 18:38:06 GMT -5
just to show that I was not lying and well to seal my fate..... Unvote: archangel [/color] Vote: Special ED [/color] [/quote] You are so infuriating. claim/share/ do something. You should be whacked with something smelly and large
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on May 13, 2011 18:51:57 GMT -5
Current (Unchecked) vote count:
Captain Pinkies (11,9)*: Special Ed [4], Suburban Plankton [47,198,209], septimus [88], Meeko [156], LightFoot [161, 264], JustBeingGinger [228], Storyteller [269], guiri [304], CatInaSuit [317], colby11 [341] Fluiddruid (6,5): Archangel [30,203,246], gnarlycharlie [227], BillMc [343], LightFoot[363], Merestil Haye [374] Archangel (2,3): CatInaSuit [26,317], metallicsquink [37], Captain Pinkies [90] Paranoia (0,1): colby11 [176,313] JustBeingGinger (1,1): Honest Moley [263] colby11 (1,0): guiri (1,1): Rysto [321] Meeko (1,1): Dirx [371] gnarlycharlie (0,1): Archangel [203,246] CatInaSuit (0,1): septimus [60,88] Special Ed (0,1): Suburban Plankton [198,209]
With these votes Captain Pinkies will be lynched.
Please note any corrections.
ToDay will end in approximately one hour.
|
|
|
Post by Holy Moley! on May 13, 2011 19:27:53 GMT -5
Again, I was frustrated at the REACTION to my post restriction, not at the restriction itself. Specifically at the fact that three people agreed with the insanely stupid idea that I should stay quiet the entire day to prove that I didn't get a penalty. There is an untruth. Even if part of the claim is true OBVIOUSLY Moley WAS frustrated and asked the mod to change his restriction for D1. See below ~~snip~~1) I claim to the mod that my post restriction is unfair on Day One because nobody's mentioned me. ~snip~ Nobody has produced any reason why Sis. C would refuse to temporarily lift my post restriction when I haven't been able to post a single thing because of it in the first three days of the game, and it looks seriously likely that I might not be able to post anything for the rest of the day. You don't think that a mod would consider it unfair that a player hasn't been able to post anything for over half a game-Day? Not going to “quote” this one. It will confuse the page idlemafia.com/index.cgi?action=gotopost&board=woo&thread=1626&post=78126Does that not sound frustrated to you? I can't see why Moley would deny the obvious Ok, and now I'm totally confused. I don't even "get" what I'm supposed to be denying here. That I thought the post restriction was unfair during the first two-thirds of day one and asked the mod to change it, or that I was annoyed by people's reaction to my claim? I've never denied either statement. What are you even arguing with me about here? And whatever it is, is it worth it? Is it of such vital importance? Seriously, I've had girlfriends who take my feelings less seriously than you're taking them now. Chill. I don't think the cause of my frustration, whatever it is or you think it's supposed to be, has anything to do with whether or not I, or anybody else, is scum! Now let's get down to business. Unvote Ginger. Upon further reading, she looks like insane town rather than scum; and at least she's been forthcoming. I hate doing this, but it's a choice between lynching somebody who's probably town, and somebody who's admittedly not. The day ends in under two hours' time and I don't think any other vote will make a difference right now, so vote: Fluid.Now, suspicions. I've been going through everyone as much as possible. Individually, here's what I got (and please excuse me if I get genders wrong, I really can't be bothered to check everyone)... Colby, Ed, Meeko, Gnarlycharlie, Lightfoot, Story, Bill, Plankton, Dirk, Meeko, Merestil Haye - I don't feel as if I have a good read on these guys at all, but I'd put good money on there being at least two scum amongst them. Little things I'd noticed: GnarlyCharlie has a spreadsheet. (I have a jotter and a biro.) Besides making my genitalia feel kind of small, this feels like the kind of thing a townie would use. Charlie was also worried about the voting situation when Ace had seven votes. My trouble here is that he also didn't unvote Ace at the same time (although in all fairness, neither did anybody else). Didn't it look by then like the scum weren't particularly interested in keeping Ace around? Meeko was suspicious of Colby, but actually voted Ace late on in the day. He / she also voted Cap'n Pinkies quite early on. Without a definite read, it wouldn't hugely surprise me if Meeko turned out to be scum. Lightfoot is in a similar position - (s)he also voted Ace quite late on. As for the argument over my "frustration", well, I think I've officially lost track of that one. Story and Dirk were against the Ace bandwagon. Story was also against the Archangel case. The interesting thing here is that while I agree with Story on Archangel, I think there had to be at least one scum opposing the Ace bandwagon so they didn't look too closely entwined. If I were scum, I'd maybe have either voted a random person halfway through the day or later, or added a vote onto a townie who already had one. If there is a scum player out there who's acted this way (and I think there is) then Paranoia, Storyteller, Plankton, BillMC and Dirk would fit best in the role. As for the rest, I think Archangel has been fairly consistent in his attitude of lynching third-parties - I don't say I agree with it, but that kind of consistency usually suggests town rather than scum. I still have doubts about his "buddying up" with myself and Storyteller early, and I hope we're not both being fooled by this (assuming Story and Archangel aren't both scum). Rysto, Septimus, Squink, Guiri and Septimus just "feel" like Town to me. I can't explain why, just that they come across as genuine I suppose. If they're scum, they have a good town persona. I'd expect at least one aggressive scum who makes an effort to portray a good town "persona" with frustrations, anger, etc; possibly more, so I'm by no means placing them as "clear", but neither am I going to be voting for them in the forseeable future. Ginger and CIAS both feel like forthright townies although I don't agree with a lot of what they've been saying. Again, not ruling them out, but not voting for them either. And I've already gone into the Pinkies question. Once again, I'm extremely worried by the lack of alternatives (although Fluid may settle that question, it seems like she's become a target fairly late on). One final point that I noticed when going through the posts: Plankton notes that he's specifically been told that if he doesn't comply with his role restrictions, he will receive a penalty vote. He points out that Fluid hasn't been told the same thing, and finds Fluid's claim less believable because of it. I will say right now that I haven't been told the same thing either with regards to my post restriction. I've been told the restriction but not any specific penalty for disobeying it. (Everything I was told regarding this restriction I've already posted on Day One - check it.) And that's all I got for the moment. I do feel as though there's been a dearth of evidence over the last two days - a lot of posts but not that much substance, with most of the attention focussed on one or two key issues (Ace, Fluid, Pinkies, etc). Assuming Pinkies is town, I think the scum will have divided themselves on these issues so as to not be obviously "linked". This leaves me with a lot of people I think might be scum, even are likely to be scum, but not a single person I'm convinced is scum (yet). Hopefully things get clearer on Day Three, assuming I'm still around. Oh, quick addenum: please invite me for a drink tonight; my post restriction isn't limited to day-talk and Sis C has been annoyingly dismissive when it comes to sending in arctic wildlife!
|
|
|
Post by septimus on May 13, 2011 19:30:33 GMT -5
I promised Captain Pinkies I'd switch my vote if he voluntarily took the 2-vote penalty. Unfortunately I have no strong suspicions of anyone. Fluid is likely a lying 3P, but he should be useful if we keep him on a short leash.
Unvote: Captain Pinkies
Vote: CatInaSuit
I've mentioned some weak scum-tells from CatInaSuit before. My feeling is that he posts a lot of tiny suspicions, and neutral questions/comments. Enough posts so he won't incur suspicions for being inactive, but not the stronger posts that Townies often use to scum hunt. I admit that this could just be his style, and the sign of a strong player but, as I say, I'm not getting scum vibes from any others.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Pinkies on May 13, 2011 19:32:05 GMT -5
Mafia in Wonderland Role « Message sent on May 1, 2011, 1:07pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You are the Ten of Hearts.
You're not really sure what the heck is going on, but you're painting the roses red so your head doesn't get cut off.
You're Vanilla Town, and have no power other than your vote.
You win so long as all threats to Town are eliminated.
|
|
|
Post by JustBeingGinger on May 13, 2011 19:41:25 GMT -5
Mafia in Wonderland Role « Message sent on May 1, 2011, 1:07pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You are the Ten of Hearts. You're not really sure what the heck is going on, but you're painting the roses red so your head doesn't get cut off. You're Vanilla Town, and have no power other than your vote. You win so long as all threats to Town are eliminated. Unvote: Captain PinkiesVote: Fluiddruid
|
|
|
Post by Ma'at on May 13, 2011 19:44:07 GMT -5
Gah - all day i've been trying to figure out how to make my vote blue and now it finally works for me (ok, i only tried it twice, but don't know why it didn't want to work for me before). testing to make sure...
test
|
|
|
Post by Ma'at on May 13, 2011 19:45:22 GMT -5
ok, nevermind - i can't figure it out
|
|
|
Post by Ma'at on May 13, 2011 19:46:54 GMT -5
why does it hate me? (i highlight my word, click colors, select blue, it looks like it's going to turn blue, and then it's just black in preview) (at least I can make something blue)
|
|
|
Post by Ma'at on May 13, 2011 19:48:38 GMT -5
test
ok - there has to be an easier way, but at least i sort of figured it out
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on May 13, 2011 19:55:53 GMT -5
testok - there has to be an easier way, but at least i sort of figured it out [ vote ] name [ /vote ] without the spaces in the brackets
|
|
|
Post by JustBeingGinger on May 13, 2011 19:57:08 GMT -5
@captain Pinkies - I don't want to lynch a possible townie. It does irk me that you waited till the very last minute to claim your PM. If you do see Day 3 I am asking you this, please contribute to the game not just defense!
I have too many doubts about Fluid and the claim. Not asking questions about your role to the MOD. No reference to any type of penalty in your PM but you have a mysterious vote on you that no one has an answer for.
|
|
|
Post by Ma'at on May 13, 2011 19:58:59 GMT -5
but with 10 minutes left, who to vote for? Was fine with Pinkies getting voted off, until he (finally) posted his role. But is he really Town? With so little time, seems like it could just be a scum ploy to confuse people and get them to unvote, with no time for discussion.
I'm thoroughly confused about the intricacies of a 3rd party, so am unsure the implications of voting fluiddruid off toDay, vs D3 or D4. I agree with others' opinion that she is hiding something, but haven't had enough time to go back and re-read to see what it was specifically that people are voting her for (a win steal issue? because she's potentially holding something back? something else?)
And M Haye asked for a vote, and made a valid point about it leaving a record. I'm racing the clock at the moment, so don't have time to put all my reasons (although as I mentioned in my first post of the day, I will reread and post my conclusions in D3), and it won't matter much anyway since this person isn't a vote leader, but seems most scummy due to my uncertainty about pinkies and my confusion about fluid druid.
vote Colby
|
|