|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 0:04:06 GMT -5
Post by Holy Moley! on Jul 28, 2008 0:04:06 GMT -5
Hockeyguy, the only thing I found suspicious was your over-enthusiastic defence when, as I said, I really didn't think you'd been attacked. Other than that it was hard to tell with you and the other people who'd not posted.
And anybody who says I haven't posted much should re-read what I've written. In post NUMBERS, maybe, my style is to use a few long posts where others use dozens of short ones; but in terms of strategy I've been one of the most prolific posters here.
HockeyMonkey - First off, the Chucky situation. I stick to my guns about this: you didn't come out against the Creepy Doll lynch. You said:
"Do y'all really think lynching Creepy Doll will get rid of it? I'm all for it, but kinda wary if you know what My Ugly Scum Bits mean."
Then, AFTER the idea had been opposed, you said:
"My Ugly Scum Bits concur with bufftabby and blastermaster that lynching Creepy Doll may have some adverse effects on my person."
Finally you said:
"I'm going to go on record opposing the "lynch hockeymonkey to see if we can get rid of Creepy Doll" movement before it get's started."
That seems pretty clear to me. you were against lynching YOURSELF (well, d'uh!) but not the doll. Nor did you make the point that it'd be a wasted lynch - your concerns were for your own health.
Another minor point: I can't see how the doll could cause you harm if it were lynched, unless it were directly connected to you in some way. Yet all along you've claimed this isn't the case, that you woke up and there it was. I realise that 1) you may have surmised a connection that the mods hadn't told you about, and 2) you were only theorizing on what someone else had said; but still, it's an eyebrow raiser. So much of this doll business is (which brings us to the one point on which we absolutely agree - I can see why you wanted to get rid of it for good... I've barely posted three paragraphs and I'm already sick of it!)
The bits regarding yourself aside, what in my analysis of the other players did you disagree with? My main point against you is that I find it very difficult to get a "handle" on where you stand. So please give me something to work with here.
|
|
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 0:04:50 GMT -5
Post by The Lion on Jul 28, 2008 0:04:50 GMT -5
Aye do no' wan' ter play a' Marbles.
Aye do, however, propose a 51/100 match between Roosh an' whoever, ef onley ter see wha' tha hell happens weth a large number of wins.
|
|
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 0:05:02 GMT -5
Post by Pollux Oil on Jul 28, 2008 0:05:02 GMT -5
Why aren't other people playing Marbles by the way? Atarus Oil I'm looking at you when My Ugly Scum Bits say this as My Ugly Scum Bits know My Ugly Scum Bits asked You to play a while back, but the others too ya know. Do they know something we leprous idiots don't? And if they're not talking, then i'm getting worried. Especially since I've got the high score.... Who NEVER Played a Marble game? Who played, and Who Won/Lost. These are things we should get onto.... Until something happens because of the marbles or it's discovered what the marbles do, I'm going to treat the marbles as a shiny distraction that creates noise and fluff and distracts people from actually playing mafia. You're using the "wait and see" method for the mafia game itself, I'm using the "wait and see" method for the marbles. That actually leads me to a point I- was planning on making anyway. I'm guessing that we're pretty much not going to be getting to a lynching majority toDay. That's partly due to the fact that this is a really shiny game and I- think people were distracted and gleefully amused by the shiny toys that the Gmods conveniently dumped in our lap. So I- propose that tomorrow, we should try and avoid playing into the Gmods' hands and get to work on finding scum. Unless something wonderfully magical happens to whoever wins the marbles game, I- think we should let the person who gets the marbles at the start of the Day give away the bag (since it seems that only something bad will happen to the person that starts with it, if CatinaSuit and Rugger/Roosh are to be believed about the PMs they got regarding the marbles) and then just forget about them. If something magically awesome does happen to the marble winner, well, I- hope we can at least keep the marbling in the background. Same goes for the doll: unless something bad happens to hockeymonkey, we should just ignore it. Unless hockeymonkey still has the doll tomorrow. That opens up another can of worms. As a note, I'm going to Atlantic City tomorrow, so I'm not going to be around for the end of the Day if something really weird happens. I'm only going for one night though, so it's not an extended leave of absence.
|
|
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 0:05:37 GMT -5
Post by Holy Moley! on Jul 28, 2008 0:05:37 GMT -5
Roosh, yes, barely. I'll play with your marbles.
|
|
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 0:12:26 GMT -5
Post by Mister Blockey on Jul 28, 2008 0:12:26 GMT -5
Molefan plays Roosh: Molefan wins!
Molefan currently has the bag of marbles
Marbles Score: CatInaSuit: 3 Roosh: 7 Santo: 3 Bufftabby:3 Cookies:2 Peeker:1 Klutz:1 Hockeyguy:4 Molefan:1
Roosh is currently winning at marbles!!!
|
|
Darth Sensitive
Mome Rath
With great power comes great responsibility / That's the catchphrase of Old Uncle Ben
Posts: 18
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 0:12:34 GMT -5
Post by Darth Sensitive on Jul 28, 2008 0:12:34 GMT -5
Mole - I didn't say you weren't accepting flak. The fact that you are casting aspersions on those who haven't accepted Santo as town is what I was referring to.
|
|
Parzival
Mome Rath
Let's all strive to do our best today![on:forgot to log out][of:forgot to log in]
Posts: 201
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 0:12:56 GMT -5
Post by Parzival on Jul 28, 2008 0:12:56 GMT -5
Why aren't other people playing Marbles by the way? <snip> Who played, and Who Won/Lost. These are things we should get onto.... Funny, l think we probably ought to get onto doing some voting; maybe trying to actually get a lynch going instead of playing around. Only one day left and all. At the very least, we ought to get a countdown started on someone. l expect that'll tell us more about the game than playing marbles will. Unless YOU know something the rest of us don't... Though l honestly think you've either given up (or never cared) on the voting front, Roosh, and are just looking to find something out for today. As for why l didn't play, I've been in the "this could be a very bad thing" camp. And now it's more distraction than anything else in my opinion. I'm seeing the futility of my vote for Santo. Normally l wouldn't mind so much, but since we haven't yet tested the voting mechanism, l feel it's in our best interests to learn something that way. Tonight l'm to tired to find a candidate; here's hoping we get all of tomorrow.
|
|
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 2:14:46 GMT -5
Post by Rajaat on Jul 28, 2008 2:14:46 GMT -5
Fucking sha me now. And BTW I'll take a rematch on the whole marble thing. It's got to be better than reading the incessant PMs. Ok! Maybe we can get on a twenty vote for that then. Vote: peekercpaBasically, from what we understand, the mechanic is that we have to all bandwagon behind one person. The likelyhood of that happening is next to nil. The next best thing is to find out what the 96 players are. Difficult to do at this stage. Would a request to see a player list that includes the full 96 be out of the question?Though I honestly assume it would be, if it wasn't included first thing. I'm not going to touch the marbles until I see what they do, just to let everyone know.
|
|
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 5:21:45 GMT -5
Post by Holy Moley! on Jul 28, 2008 5:21:45 GMT -5
Mole - My Ugly Scum Bits didn't say you weren't accepting flak. The fact that you are casting aspersions on those who haven't accepted Santo as town is what My Ugly Scum Bits was referring to. Fair enough, but as with HockeyMonkey I~ stick to my guns on this one. I~ think that the scum would naturally have somebody or bodies opposing the idea that he's cleared. I~ regard it a possible scumtell, especially if combined with other suspicious behavior. I'm not saying that every sceptic is scum, but I~ think it's very likely that at least one of them is. My bigger point is that without the benefit of investigations or confirmable role-claims, we have very little evidence to go on. The way I'm trying to get around this is to look at what I think the scum would have done up until this point to keep themselves hidden, and then see who's done it. That analysis is a balance of where I think the probabilities lie.
|
|
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 6:51:54 GMT -5
Post by Drain Bead on Jul 28, 2008 6:51:54 GMT -5
Fucking sha me now. And BTW I'll take a rematch on the whole marble thing. It's got to be better than reading the incessant PMs. Ok! Maybe we can get on a twenty vote for that then. Vote: peekercpaBasically, from what we understand, the mechanic is that we have to all bandwagon behind one person. The likelyhood of that happening is next to nil. The next best thing is to find out what the 96 players are. Difficult to do at this stage. Would a request to see a player list that includes the full 96 be out of the question?Though I honestly assume it would be, if it wasn't included first thing. I'm not going to touch the marbles until I see what they do, just to let everyone know. You know what? This is a post I can get behind 100%. If we have get to 20 votes to off someone, might as well be someone who's asking for it. I'm thinking it's the only way we'll get 20 of us to agree on anything. Plus, didn't peeker win the whole vote last night as to who's going to be the first to bite it? Wonder what happens if we're right? I'm also right there with the marbles as well--I don't want to go near any toys in this game if I don't know what they do. Plus, it's a massive distraction. unvote DiggitCamera[/color] vote peekercpa[/color]
|
|
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 7:34:17 GMT -5
Post by Idle Thoughts on Jul 28, 2008 7:34:17 GMT -5
Why aren't other people playing Marbles by the way? How do you know they're a good thing to have at the end of the game? Sure, maybe it's good to be WINNING at marbles at the end but what about the person who is currently in possesion at them at the end of Day? And adding to parz's questions, one I just wondered right now is: Today is the day when this Day is set to end. What will the mods do in the case of nobody even being close to having the correct number? molefan, you wrote that I was against Pleo at the beginning. Sorry, but you're wrong. I was never against or suspicious of Pleonast and, in fact, I was of the mind to be more apt to BELIEVE him then not. You seemed to be wrong on a lot of people. Are you reading the same game everyone else is? Are you just skimming like mad? While I do agree that I'm most suspicious of Mr. Scummyboots, Esq, and Santos at this point and that you raise some good points in your thread, if I had to name a minor third one that just cropped up right now, it would have to be yourself. Simply because you stated so many things as surities that you believe happened when, in fact, they didn't.
|
|
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 8:00:23 GMT -5
Post by Captain Klutz on Jul 28, 2008 8:00:23 GMT -5
I'm not at all sure that we need 20 votes to actually lynch someone. The opening post says that we need 20 votes to start "The Countdown". Presumably, this means that we can shorten a Day by piling up on someone, otherwise the Day will end at the normal time.
|
|
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 8:36:46 GMT -5
Post by Pleonast on Jul 28, 2008 8:36:46 GMT -5
Just wanted to pipe in that I'm still alive, but have fallen behind on reading this thread due to being on a business trip. I'll try to catch up, but don't expect much contribution from me until next week.
|
|
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 8:41:09 GMT -5
Post by CatInASuit on Jul 28, 2008 8:41:09 GMT -5
This thread is getting more and more painful to read through each time.
Oh and molefan, for the record, I'm male. ! don't know where you got the idea I'm female, but its wrong.
Santo Rugger, Why did you decide to play marbles with Roosh after he gained them, when you stated earlier that there was no way you were playing?
! don't really think the Leper role that pedescribe was talking about is valid, it appears to bear no context to the Game, unless of course, the Gastards were talking about real time play in which case interacting with him now, will get you killed in 2 Months real time, ie. you get mod-killed due to leprosy.
As for a vote, leaving it on Pollux Oil is unfair as he is not being inherently scummy. Seeing as peekercpa wants to get killed, so be it. Maybe he can also explain all the PM's he has been receiving as well.
unvote Pollux Oil
vote peekercpa
|
|
Hockey Monkey!
Borogrove
This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker over who killed who.
Posts: 371
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 9:06:53 GMT -5
Post by Hockey Monkey! on Jul 28, 2008 9:06:53 GMT -5
Do y'all really think lynching Creepy Doll will get rid of it? I'm all for it, but kinda wary if you know what My Ugly Scum Bits mean. molefan, My Ugly Scum Bits was against voting for the Creepy Doll. I'm sure you can find it on re-read. My re-read and your re-read are quite different. THEN KEEP READING.
|
|
Hockey Monkey!
Borogrove
This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker over who killed who.
Posts: 371
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 9:25:03 GMT -5
Post by Hockey Monkey! on Jul 28, 2008 9:25:03 GMT -5
Sorry, that was snarky. I initially thought lynching Creepy Doll would be a good idea, but I changed my mind. Yes, it had quite a bit to do with the fact that it might lynch me instead. What is so scummy about that? I need to stay alive to to my job. The Creepy Doll has nothing to do with my role. It's an aside. I don't know what it does or why it's here, but is it unreasonable to surmise that something bad happening to it could result in something bad happening to me? I mean, I tried to burn it and I got burned.
Besides, I'm not even sure if I still have it. I offered it to hockeyguy and he accepted, but Mr Blockey never mentioned it.
I will not be playing marbles. No offense, but I've had enough to deal with without adding a fucking Bag of Marbles to the mix. I'm sure you understand. I'm not sure why Roosh is so hyped up about the marbles in the first place.
|
|
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 9:25:18 GMT -5
Post by Idle Thoughts on Jul 28, 2008 9:25:18 GMT -5
Oh, hey, I have some popcorn[/color] if anyone would like some.
(Okay, not really--it's not any kind of claim to have an object, I'm just joking. But this game, so far, has been nothing else if not highly amusing and interesting to read and since it seems we've got people playing freakin' marbles and talking about their own names and fiddling with dolls, I might as well try to get away with one post at just eating popcorn[/color] and enjoying this trainwreck of a game)
|
|
Santo Rugger
Mome Rath
The Obviously Innocent Townie
The Rugger formerly known as Pygmy[on:BYAHH!][of:BYAHH?]
Posts: 3
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 9:52:13 GMT -5
Post by Santo Rugger on Jul 28, 2008 9:52:13 GMT -5
Sorry, that was snarky. My Ugly Scum Bits initially thought lynching Creepy Doll would be a good idea, but My Ugly Scum Bits changed my mind. Yes, it had quite a bit to do with the fact that it might lynch me instead. What is so scummy about that? The scummy part is not that you changed your mind. The scummy part is that you told molefan that you were against lynching the doll, strongly implying that you were always against it, which simply isn't true. A response of, "I thought lynching the doll might get rid of it, but upon further reflection, realized it might get of me," is a lot different than saying, "I was against lynching the doll." Which leads us to the point CatInA brings up concerning the marbles. I thought it might be a bad idea to play with them, and then my curiosity got the best of me and I changed my mind. The difference is that I'm not going to reply to CatInA by saying "I always thought playing marbles would be fun!"
|
|
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 9:52:36 GMT -5
Post by The Real FCOD on Jul 28, 2008 9:52:36 GMT -5
This game is killing Mr. Scummyboots, esq...
Mr. Scummyboots, esq. will lump this into one massive quote so as to save space:You're all a bunch of bastards for continuing to use "FCoD" or "Mr. SB" or anything else when referring to Mr. Scummyboots, esq. Stop it and stop it now! Mr. Scummyboots, esq. is seriously pissed off right now!
No, he does not. I still don't get why people think he does. You're all crazy, clearly.
----------
Mr. Scummyboots, esq. is extremely overwhelmed by the sheer number of posts in this game.
Duke -- Mr. Scummyboots, esq. does not understand the logic behind your vote for him. You apparently have no reason, but you won't unvote until you hear from Mr. Scummyboots, esq? Well, Mr. Scummyboots, esq. is not evil, he is townie! Please don't vote for Mr. Scummyboots, esq. unless you actually have a good reason (or at least what you think is a good reason, in the case of Idle Thoughts).
Mr. Scummyboots, esq. thinks that either peekercpa has a terribly wicked post restriction or he is batshit insane. He has posted nothing but gibberish and Mr. Scummyboots, esq. has no idea what he's talking about. Mr. Scummyboots, esq. tends to think that the reason is a post restriction, and is thus less inclined to vote for peekercpa, but will do so if we need to reach 20 votes before the end of the day. Mr. Scummyboots, esq. really has no idea for whom to vote. This game is one giant clusterfuck wrapped in a huge puzzle.
Mr. Scummyboots, esq. will play marbles again with whomever has them.
--FCOD
|
|
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 9:53:28 GMT -5
Post by CatInASuit on Jul 28, 2008 9:53:28 GMT -5
*pulls up a chair and munches on some Popcorn* Oh, hey, My Ugly Scum Bits have some popcorn[/color] if anyone would like some. [/quote] Both bolded and in colour, methinks there is more to this than meets the eye. Excuse the paranoia, but would you two like to explain about the popcorn seeing as these two are the only references in the game so far.
|
|
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 10:02:35 GMT -5
Post by Idle Thoughts on Jul 28, 2008 10:02:35 GMT -5
*pulls up a chair and munches on some Popcorn* Oh, hey, My Ugly Scum Bits have some popcorn[/color] if anyone would like some. [/quote] Both bolded and in colour, methinks there is more to this than meets the eye. Excuse the paranoia, but would you two like to explain about the popcorn seeing as these two are the only references in the game so far. [/quote] I've already explained it. I did it randomly and to poke fun at all the other color coded things around here. My guess is that PO did too. How about you? Would you like some lettuce[/color] instead? Or maybe a nice, thick milkshake[/color]? Or some bacon[/color], perhaps? None of that stuff is in the game, as far as I know, but yet, that doesn't stop me from putting them in color simply to mock the other things floating around of that nature. I only put popcorn in yellow because that's the usual color of said food, no?
|
|
Hockey Monkey!
Borogrove
This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker over who killed who.
Posts: 371
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 10:14:31 GMT -5
Post by Hockey Monkey! on Jul 28, 2008 10:14:31 GMT -5
Sorry, that was snarky. My Ugly Scum Bits initially thought lynching Creepy Doll would be a good idea, but My Ugly Scum Bits changed my mind. Yes, it had quite a bit to do with the fact that it might lynch me instead. What is so scummy about that? The scummy part is not that you changed your mind. The scummy part is that you told molefan that you were against lynching the doll, strongly implying that you were always against it, which simply isn't true. A response of, "I thought lynching the doll might get rid of it, but upon further reflection, realized it might get of me," is a lot different than saying, "I was against lynching the doll." Which leads us to the point CatInA brings up concerning the marbles. My Ugly Scum Bits thought it might be a bad idea to play with them, and then my curiosity got the best of me and My Ugly Scum Bits changed my mind. The difference is that I'm not going to reply to CatInA by saying "I always thought playing marbles would be fun!" I see where you are coming from, but in my mind, the end result was the same, so sorry I didn't write it all out to begin with.
|
|
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 10:56:31 GMT -5
Post by bufftabby on Jul 28, 2008 10:56:31 GMT -5
As promised, a dissection of Molefan's lenghty trust/dont trust list:
So anyone who doesn't just accept Santo as a townie is scummy? Brilliant scumhunting plan. Let me know how that goes. Seriously, though, Ah don't see the logic behind that. His role is that he's "obviously confirmed", but Ah don't think that's the case, and there's nothing scummy about a healthy dose of skepticism. We don't know his alignment, and it's foolish to assume we do.
Or maybe it's Day One, and there's not a whole hell of a lot to say.
Trust lists are a terrible idea. Either you are scum, or you will be exploited by scum because of this list. Neither of those options are very pro-town.
Then why don't you mention these votes in your cases against scum? The only case you mention it in is against me, and Ah never even voted for Pleonast. Ah FoS'ed.
This makes zero sense to me. So, hoopy's on your Town list, but you say to block him, one would want to be "110% certain" he's scum. So the scum are blocking him because they're sure he's scum? A PFK is blocking him because they're somehow "certain" he's scum? Maybe I'm just not understanding. Maybe you're just not making sense.
Ahh, back to Santo. Please, tell me, what scum has he hunted so strongly? Ah don't recall hanging any scum. Did you guys lynch without me?
Ah don't have any particular feelings on Idle Thoughts so far, but this doesn't make sense. Just because someone supports Town (which Pleonast may or may not be--ah have no idea), doesn't make them Town.
You know, scum will try to do that too. (Not to say anything for or against RoOsh here; Ah disagree with the logic)
Quick to jump on bandwagons? Yeah, I guess her analysis just doesn't pass the sniff test. She should really speak up a lot more.
Now, molefan's case against moi: No, ah didn't. Ah FoS'ed Pleo, and explained why. Ah explicitly stated that ah was getting on the diggitcamara wagon. Ah agreed with the logic, and still consider diggit to be suspicious. Since I'm not the only one, I'm clearly a bandwagoning scum. And as Ah said before, Ah supported Mr Scummyboots esq somewhat (thanks for the quote, kat). If that's a bandwagon, ah have been playing this game all wrong.
So? If that is Pleo's role, he wouldn't have needed to read that part of the Dawn post to know about it. So what is your point? Skimming in this particular case was scummy to me, and Ah stand by it.
Ah'd say a player missing an entire day (hoopy) is more than "just color". So again, what's your point?
Because if scum are anything, it's predictable. Not to mention that if I've only posted fluff, how did Ah get on so many bandwagons? Yeah, there's a fair bit of fluff in there, but I've also posted my opinions on things, obviously. If you'd like me to quote all of my game-related posts, I'll be happy to. It might take a minute, because there's plenty of them.
Like Ah said in my previous post, Ah found myself shaking my head and "Bwuh???ing" throughout Molefan's post before I ever reached the part about his vote for me. Anyone who likes can label this as an OMGUS vote, but that would just mean you haven't read a damn thing I had to say about his post.
unvote diggitcamara[/color]
[colo=blue]vote molefan[/color]
Lynch all liars, for one thing. ("Queen of bandwaggoning," my ass)
Creating trust lists is anti-town, leaving plenty of room for exploitation by scum.
Scum try to make the illogical look logical.
I'm pretty confident in my vote, but if necessary, ah will switch it to make a lynch happen, should the lynch seem viable.
NETA: From a subsequent post by molefan: Again, cite please, because I certainly did not. See above where I state that ah am still suspicious of him.
But...but...that would be an about-turn...after I've spoken out and been defended! Egad!
(Ah am praying to Cthulu that all my coding is correct.)
|
|
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 11:02:11 GMT -5
Post by bufftabby on Jul 28, 2008 11:02:11 GMT -5
Shit.
vote molefan
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 11:18:30 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Jul 28, 2008 11:18:30 GMT -5
! don't really think the Leper role that pedescribe was talking about is valid, it appears to bear no context to the Game, unless of course, the Gastards were talking about real time play in which case interacting with him now, will get you sha'd in 2 Months real time, ie. you get mod-killed due to leprosy. Yes, they did mean real-time. I'm not sure if that means this game will go on forever, and my role will be useful, or if that means the game will be normal speed, and my role will be useless. I don't like it either way. FTR, I tend to lurk in every game, if by lurking you mean "post everything at once a few times a day", because that's my modus operandi. Note that I was almost modkilled in the Simpletown game. My first game, and I was there the entire time. I just didn't need to post that much (I thought). Also, I'm going to Vote Duke of Scotlandbecause I think pressure votes are a crock, and it's all he's harped about all day. Seriously, you think that one vote is going to get him to transform into a heavy poster? One vote that you don't really mean at all? Votes are for scum, and until you start looking and stop dithering, it seems more like you're trying to flog a dead horse (and drag everyone else away from useful tasks to watch) than actually help the town. And that's scummy.
|
|
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 12:15:27 GMT -5
Post by Mister Blockey on Jul 28, 2008 12:15:27 GMT -5
FCOD plays Molefan: FCOD wins!
FCOD currently has the bag of marbles
Marbles Score: CatInaSuit: 3 Roosh: 7 Santo: 3 Bufftabby:3 Cookies:2 Peeker:1 Klutz:1 Hockeyguy:4 Molefan:1 FCOD:1
Roosh is currently winning at marbles!!!
|
|
RoOsh
FGM
Former BatMod
[on:Wanna see a magic trick?][of:See You, Space Cowboy....]
Posts: 284
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 12:21:28 GMT -5
Post by RoOsh on Jul 28, 2008 12:21:28 GMT -5
Hey M-ds... Can I get a Vote Count?
*because I suddenly realized something* The Mods haven't been giving us Vote Counts... in fact, the only thing they've been giving us CLOSE to the vote counts... is that Marble list. ... FUCK.
|
|
RoOsh
FGM
Former BatMod
[on:Wanna see a magic trick?][of:See You, Space Cowboy....]
Posts: 284
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 12:22:14 GMT -5
Post by RoOsh on Jul 28, 2008 12:22:14 GMT -5
a happy dance? REALLY?
CAN I GET A VOTECOUNT?
|
|
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 12:26:30 GMT -5
Post by The Real FCOD on Jul 28, 2008 12:26:30 GMT -5
FCOD plays Molefan: FCOD wins! FCOD currently has the bag of marblesMarbles Score: CatInaSuit: 3 Roosh: 7 Santo: 3 Bufftabby:3 Cookies:2 Peeker:1 Klutz:1 Hockeyguy:4 Molefan:1 FCOD:1 Roosh is currently winning at marbles!!! Don't call Mr. Scummyboots, esq. FCOD, dammit! GRR! After reading bufftabby's post, Mr. Scummyboots, esq. thinks that Molefan is coming off very suspicious. Mr. Scummyboots, esq. is getting the impression that he is trying very hard to stay above the radar and appear helpful. However, the "helpful" analysis is full of falsehoods and bad reasoning, and Mr. Scummyboots, esq. thinks it smells of scum attempting to appear townie through being extremely helpful. Vote Molefan. It's sort of a "Mr. Scummyboots, esq. too" vote to the one bufftabby placed, but her post opened Mr. Scummyboots, esq.'s eyes. Roosh, would you care for a re-match at marbles[/color]? --FCOD
|
|
RoOsh
FGM
Former BatMod
[on:Wanna see a magic trick?][of:See You, Space Cowboy....]
Posts: 284
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day One
Jul 28, 2008 12:34:59 GMT -5
Post by RoOsh on Jul 28, 2008 12:34:59 GMT -5
Roosh, would you care for a re-match at marbles[/color]? --FCOD[/quote] No. No I don't think so.
|
|