|
Post by cathi on May 29, 2012 23:23:51 GMT -5
@ladyrogue, thank you for an explanation; I will take it under consideration as I continue to re-read and try to figure out who's who. For now, I only trust Silver Jan & Mahaloth (I think).
|
|
|
Post by LadyRogue-II on May 30, 2012 0:24:02 GMT -5
@ladyrogue, thank you for an explanation; I will take it under consideration as I continue to re-read and try to figure out who's who. For now, I only trust Silver Jan & Mahaloth (I think). I understand that.
|
|
|
Post by AmyKay on May 30, 2012 2:32:32 GMT -5
Wasn't a living dead LOL can't remember the name suppose to give us info on the protection they used in their first life or did I msis it? Are you referring to septimus #1, the dead Town Doctor? I think Idle Thoughts has confirmed that I'm allowed to reveal those Protectees, even though the information would normally have died with septimus #1. I'll reveal if there seems to be a Town consensus that I should. But I worry about downside with little upside. should we be interested in who the Doctor protected before dying? As Septimus #2 suggested, I don't know what Town stands to gain from this, other than trying to figure out how many kills the Scums are getting (and would the name(s) of the protected even help in that for sure?). I don't know if it would be helpful to Scums after-the-fact, either, though... unless it just makes them curious as to why certain people were protected. am I missing something?
|
|
|
Post by wombat99 on May 30, 2012 10:01:24 GMT -5
Are you referring to septimus #1, the dead Town Doctor? I think Idle Thoughts has confirmed that I'm allowed to reveal those Protectees, even though the information would normally have died with septimus #1. I'll reveal if there seems to be a Town consensus that I should. But I worry about downside with little upside. should we be interested in who the Doctor protected before dying? As Septimus #2 suggested, I don't know what Town stands to gain from this, other than trying to figure out how many kills the Scums are getting (and would the name(s) of the protected even help in that for sure?). I don't know if it would be helpful to Scums after-the-fact, either, though... unless it just makes them curious as to why certain people were protected. am I missing something? I think knowing who Septimus #1 protected would only be worth revealing if he had prevented a kill. That would give information on the number of kills per night. We have confirmed 3 NKs each night but is there a chance that there are 4 NKs?
|
|
|
Post by Rich Beckman on May 30, 2012 10:39:26 GMT -5
<snip> I think knowing who Septimus #1 protected would only be worth revealing if he had prevented a kill. That would give information on the number of kills per night. We have confirmed 3 NKs each night but is there a chance that there are 4 NKs? And how would we know if his protection prevented a kill or not? The only thing anyone would learn is who Septimus considered important enough to protect. This strikes me as far more useful info for scum than it is for town, but even for them it is nothing more than Septimus' opinion based on One Day of play. If town is about to lynch the player Septimus protected, Septimus could argue against the lynch by saying "I feel strongly enough about this player that I protected him that first night". But how much more weight does that carry? It is not like the players given the Doctor roles are suddenly imbued with insights above and beyond us mere mortals. Keep it to yourself, Septimus.
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on May 30, 2012 11:09:54 GMT -5
Catching up now. I'm replying as I read. The mod has closed the previous threads, which makes quoting a lot harder. Gadarene in D2.457Yes, and the rest of us are perfectly entitled to call out contradictory claims as suspicious. Townies need to tell the truth, so that it's only scum that are lying. If town and scum all lie, it's a lot harder to discern what team someone is on. LadyRogue in D2.474You don't have to do anything. But how should the rest of us evaluate which team you're on? If you write few posts, you give us little. Should we assume you're town who doesn't want to us win? Or should we assume you're scum who's avoiding posting because we'll see through your lies? Maybe we'll ignore you for a few Days, but at some point, we will start looking for evidence that you're on our side. And we won't find any, because you're not posting much. So you'll get lynched. If you are town, start posting useful comments now, so you don't get mislynched later. If you're scum, do whatever you like because lynching you is what we want to do anyway. wombat99 on D2.483Yes, you've addressed #1. So you have a plausible reason for your comment. However, I don't believe you. For #2, you're very wrong. Anything scum say might (or might not) be a lie. We can make no inferences from michelehunter's if they are scum. If they are telling the truth (about the role and the target list), only scum gain any benefit from the target list, because they know michele is telling the truth. The rest of us don't, even if it is the truth. This is why I accuse you of fishing--the information you request is useful to scum, but not so much to town. And scum are likely to naively ask the fishing question, because they wouldn't realize it something townies would not ask. Thus my vote. Archangel on D2.526Well, I dropped it on Day One. Meeko is over-reactive and hyper-defensive this game. They seem to only respond to players who vote for them. So by Day Two, Meeko had no reason to attack me. The other votes on me were rather irrational; I'm not surprised that they didn't come back once players got a better grip on the game. The votes disappearing on Meeko are harder to explain. I think Meeko has let a personal distaste for my play tactics (in this game and past) to override any rational thought on them. So I'm inclined not to vote for them right now, since irrationality is not a scum tell. I haven't seen others explain why they dropped their votes, but the hyper-defensiveness is a little suspicious. patricia on D2.577This is a very cogent comment and is an excellent reason for voting for Meeko. lianne on D2.580So what if someone is accusing you? That's the point of a mafia game. Plus, a vote on a townie is wrong, but it's not useless, assuming there's an explanation. We're going to get some lynches wrong, but the game is built for that. We still get information from a mislynch. Merstil Haye on D2.584That would be a stupid lynch, then. I wonder how many of the votes on you were scum? Meeko on D2.601Meeko, you're really looking silly here when you quote patricia's very explicit explanation of why they're voting for you and then you reply with a "where's your reason?". It's like you're not even playing the game, but simply over-reacting to whatever blinkie light you happen to notice. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I've finished Day Two. I'll do Night Two next.
|
|
|
Post by wombat99 on May 30, 2012 11:34:00 GMT -5
And how would we know if his protection prevented a kill or not? That's true. We wouldn't unless it was a more obvious protection situation like protecting our confirmed masons and detective, and even then it would just be a guess. Never mind
|
|
|
Post by supermel on May 30, 2012 11:40:56 GMT -5
I don't think anything good would come from Septimus revealing anything. If he wasn't reincarnated as a sub we wouldn't be able to ask then either.
|
|
|
Post by patricia on May 30, 2012 12:32:55 GMT -5
Hello all I hope everyone in the states had a great holiday weekend. Not see much to write/talk about here in day 4 - I Guess Idle will post the vote count and confirm the kill when he can until then
Vote: Meeko
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on May 30, 2012 15:56:19 GMT -5
Okay, not much to comment on Night Two. On to Day Three. DYAR is being replaced by STARRIRAIN (who is subbing back in). Yuck. Substitutions are bad enough, but revolving door subs (putting back a player who's already been eliminated) is a horrible policy. It'll cause too much confusion. Other players will have a hard time separating their previous opinions from the current role. And the revolved player will be using too much information from their previous role to have an unbiased opinion of the other players. Bad choice. Michelehunter, might I suggest you take out either Laurie Rn or Endhoot? Since, ya know, they're both scum?) That's very helpful information, but it really feels like cheating to have an action from the previous Night make use of information revealed ToDay.I think Michelehunter should take one and then we could lynch the second one. It looks like we have a damn good town team. 2 for 2 for the Vig, and detective This is a double scum slip. First, poor advice completely ignoring the part that we have a Vig to kill known scum. Then, "yay-team" comments that subconsciously imply that dizzy is on our team. Trying to reinforce the validity of the bad suggestion. Vote endhootReasons are obvious. Hal claimed Detective and threw out 2 names, and Laurie Rn has been taken down by Michelehunter, leaving endhoot. Also, endhoot voted Aleetha in Day 2 for the reason of lurking, when in fact endhoot herself was lurking most of the time in Day 1 and Day 2. I think it was self-incrimination. The reasons are obvious and wrong. If there is a Vigilante player (or at least someone taking out scum at Night), it's always better to let the Vig kill known scum rather than lynch them. There's two benefits from lynching. 1: we remove a player we think is scum. And 2: we get a record of votes and interactions from deciding the lynch. Lynching known scum when there's a Night-killer who will do it for us completely guts point 2. If we lynch endhoot, we'll gain almost no information from this Day, because scum have a safe vote and town have no incentive to think about other players. And the final problem with lynching known scum when there's a Vig, is that if the Vig is a mandatory killer (they must kill every Night), we're forcing them to take a poorly informed shot. We're trading a lynch decided by lots of interaction for a kill of a player who has no chance to respond. If the Vig kills a power role because we took away their safe kill, our lynch will be a minimal gain. Way too soon to be doing this man. You know this. Here is Meeko complaining again about another player without contributing anything positive to the game. Our vig seems to be doing a fine job on his own. I think we should just lynch Endhoot and let our vig continue on with who he thinks is scum. No reason for a mislynch if we don't need one. Vote: endhoot Hal, a fine job, but could you tell us why you waited until Today to announce your results? It seems you could have prevented a mislynch Yesterday? For the newbies, perhaps we might have a discussion about when is the best time to claim for the various roles? Masons and detectives in particular. I see no reason for Doctors, vanilla, Crazies, or Vigs to ever claim. Or perhaps some instructions on breadcrumbing? So instead of a chance for a mislynch (where the player in question has the opportunity for defense, plus the responses from other players to that), you'd rather have a chance for a mis-kill (where a player is summarily killed without any chance to respond and with no interactions with other players)? That does not seem like a useful trade. Here is why a player should claim: claims under pressure are worthless. It's too easy for scum to claim something, anything to delay their lynch. Townies should claim well before there's any indication they could be lynched. Scum take a huge risk by claiming without pressure, because it brings attention to them. Attention is something that scum try to avoid, because it means their slips are more likely to be noticed. Town take some risk by claiming without pressure, but it is lower than the risk scum take. It reduces the chance for a mislynch and lets information be revealed before their death. It puts the pressure on scum to decide how to handle the claim. The specific circumstances might make an unforced claim more or less useful, but any player who waits until they're under lynch-pressure to claim should expect to be lynched. And you know it's very difficult to think about dead players as "new" and not use their "old persona" against/for them. Exactly why it's bad form to substitute back in former players. ATTENTION: BRIDEOFPEZ is now being replaced by SEPTIMUS. This is ridiculous! If revolving-door substitutions are bad, revolving door substitions of players with extra information is game-breaking.septimus (the player) has information from their first role that their second role should not have. If the new role is scum, then scum get info that the rest of us don't. If the new role is town, it's more complicated, but it's still information available that should not be. The moderator really needs to publicly reveal the actions and results of the first septimus's role so that the current septimus's team does not have an advantage.But if there is only one more Mason, is that no different from no more Mason? A solitary Mason has no power, right? A lone Mason still has a power--they know they are the only Mason. It might not seem like a great power, but in a game known to have Masons, it is useful. It prevents scum from claiming Mason, and by claiming Mason, the player becomes unlynchable. Hopefully someone has or will investigate Pleo. I must admit my skepticism as well when checking up on his posts. It would seem Pleonast has not even posted since about 4 days ago. I know I didn't throw myself under the bus for an experienced 'townie with a power role', who's not even been around to give their input....hmmmm... In a game of noobs, you more experienced players become such an asset to the town that it just doesn't sit right with me that Pleonast really hasn't given us very much in the game at all to this point. Granted there have been useful tips ,as there were from a lot of the older crowd, looking back on his posts it seems like a lot of fluff and misdirection. I could be paranoid here, but I really feel like he hasn't given us very much to actually go on. I mean, I see votes and random finger pointing, but not very much in the way of building cases. It also doesn't help that everyone I've seen him finger happens to be on the list of people whom I believe to be town at this point. Not smudging, my opinion is that Pleonast is most likely scum. Feel free to prove me wrong. I think at the rate we've been losing townies, we may not be able to wait til D4 as Gadarene suggested to reevaluate the Pleo suspicions. Not to say this is the only person on my naughty list, but I'm going through them one at a time here. First, it's not useful to investigate a claimed power role. At some point I'll reveal more information, and I'll be judged on that. It's better to investigate players that one can't get good reads on. Second, either you're crazy or conflating me with someone else, because I've made cases and put votes on a lot of players. (True, I've been absent, but that's real-life interfering.) Let's review my votes in this game to date. D1.35D1.338D1.560D2.135D2.135D2.456Click on the links if you want to read the full arguments. And those are just the votes. I've been commenting and arguing with other players the whole game. Search on my past posts; there's a lot there. The more I think about this - what *is* the advantage of lynching Endhoot now? She is confirmed scum, she's not hurting anything by remaining in the game for the moment. Today, everyone, including scum, will vote endhoot, and scum can safely vote endhoot without affecting the outcome or revealing any information. But later on, when the balance of town/scum is closer, it might be very telling to see who does or does not vote to lynch her. Exactly. We're screwing ourselves in the long run by lynching endhoot now. The advantage is killing a bad guy instead of a good guy. So far town has lynched two good guys. Why would you want to make it three? Town may not gain much info from the voting record Today, but why postpone that? Do you think that if we vote endhoot Tomorrow or on Day 14 that the voting record will be more informative? We'll never gain information from lynching endhoot (unless Hal is lying) because there's never information gained from a safe lynch. So let's not waste a lynch on a known scum that'll die ToNight anyway. You yourself admit that Pleonast is Unconfirmed. Therefore I regard Day 1 for me as no Harm, No Foul. .... And I believe we are both voting for Endhoot here. I Regard Day 3 for me (and you) as no harm no foul. .... Your vote on town added to the mislynch. My vote on Gad did nothing. What the heck? You're defense for two votes is that someone else made the same votes? A suspicious vote is suspicious no matter who else made it. Your bottom line is that you're slightly less suspicious than richbeckman. How is that supposed to make anyone less suspicious of you? It feels more like a ploy to divert attention to someone else--"see that player has made about the same votes as me, look at them, not me". For Day 4: I will likely be voting for Silver Jan - just from looking through the first couple of Days. A couple of things have pinged me: - Comment about spotting francescaj's slip, why come out and say you noticed it after the fact. You said the scum noticed and NK'd her. How do you know this when it could have been a Vigilante mishit?
That could be a good catch. Can you quote or link exactly what you're referring to? Since it seems having a fish-in-a-barrel hasn't completely stifled conversation, I'm ok with closing up shop a little ahead of time toDay. Vote End Day Huh? There is a good conversation despite the safe lynch, so you want to shut it down? I can't see any townie motivation for that. If you're really a mason and another one of your masons is alive, s/he should claim now because if you (or s/he) are killed, it will confirm the other. If it was just you and Gadarene, well, then, there's no way to prove it until you die. Bad advice. If SilverJan is a Mason and not the last living one, they should claim "I'm a Mason". Period. There's no need for yet another Mason to reveal themself at this point. A Mason can confirm themself by stating their role and surviving without a counterclaim. A false Mason claim will have a real Mason popping up and saying so. The lack of that confirms a true Mason. Masons only need to publicly confirm each other after they've claimed to avoid the lynch. Thank you so much, couldn't you have waited til tomorrow. We have a Vig. Scum can be Night-killed. Since we're wasting our lynch anyway, it's good to generate plausible targets for the Vig.
|
|
|
Post by 8hf2lk1 on May 30, 2012 16:29:39 GMT -5
There is at her
|
|
|
Post by dizzymrslizzy on May 30, 2012 16:33:55 GMT -5
Pleaonast You keep saying "we have a Vig". I think it's been proved without a doubt that there IS no Vigilante in this game.
There are two secret roles.
We've seen 2 Crazy Townies and One Serial Killer
So where does a Vig fit in? It doesn't in the model outlined above.
|
|
|
Post by guiri on May 30, 2012 16:40:05 GMT -5
Sorry, I should have specified the reason for your vote. The mantra around here is give reasons for your vote. I was not aware that it was up to me to go through all of your past posts to figure out your previously given reasons. I guess I suffer from my inability to remember what everyone has said in the past 1600 plus posts. As for my "buddy," as near as I can figure, there are no "buddies" in Mafia Games. From my vast experience of Three plus Days of playing Mafia Games, I understand it is appropriate to thank you for the smudge, though I am at a loss for the reason for it. Thanks for answering the question. Yeah, I realize I was a bit harsh on you. I interpreted your question as a soft defense of Texcat and so went full attack to see your response however, looking back over your posts, it's not the first time you've asked for an explanation of a vote and so I may have gone a little overboard. @ guiri - why the smudge on richbeckman? Just curious if you see something I don't. See above and: - this looks like he's fully decided to vote lianne but is overly concerned about how his vote will be viewed, the fact that lianne was scum just gives him more reason to be sure to make a good solid vote that stands up to scrutiny - the comments here and here look like sore scum, a little bit forced, a feeble attempt to cast suspicion on the claimed cop - others mentioned a huh moment in response to his wow on Meeko, but I think it was well explained - the "I told you so" tone in a couple of posts about lianne before she was killed here ("I can't believe anyone voted for anyone else") and after here
|
|
|
Post by guiri on May 30, 2012 16:43:16 GMT -5
Pleaonast You keep saying "we have a Vig". I think it's been proved without a doubt that there IS no Vigilante in this game. I believe Pleo is still catching up and posting at the end of each cycle: "I've finished Day Two. I'll do Night Two next.", "Okay, not much to comment on Night Two. On to Day Three.", he simply hasn't read Dawn Day 4 yet.
|
|
|
Post by dizzymrslizzy on May 30, 2012 16:47:34 GMT -5
As my vote stands on her because there are lots of players that aren't posting on here and she has singled me out from day one. I joined this game because of the scavenger hunt on packrat, so I am playing as best as I can seeing as this is my first game. I just find her behavior kind of scummy because of the single-mindedness of her smudging me. I keep harping on you BECAUSE (1) you refuse to explain your behavior, and (2) you won't participate. At this point the other non-participators have been replaced. And those participators weren't lurking around insisting that they don't have to voice an opinion. You STILL refuse to voice your opinion. What do you think? A lot has gone on in 4 Days, who is on your radar, and why? And for the record, we're on Day4 and this is the first time I'm voting for you, so I'm not being narrow minded in the least bit!
|
|
|
Post by dizzymrslizzy on May 30, 2012 17:08:42 GMT -5
I believe Pleo is still catching up and posting at the end of each cycle: "I've finished Day Two. I'll do Night Two next.", "Okay, not much to comment on Night Two. On to Day Three.", he simply hasn't read Dawn Day 4 yet. Understood, I thought in his last post that he said that he didn't see anything worth commenting on Day 3 and was then commenting on toDay. I see that he was still back on Day 3.
|
|
|
Post by michelehunter on May 30, 2012 17:32:05 GMT -5
snipped Catching up now. I'm replying as I read. The mod has closed the previous threads, which makes quoting a lot harder. Gadarene in D2.457Yes, and the rest of us are perfectly entitled to call out contradictory claims as suspicious. Townies need to tell the truth, so that it's only scum that are lying. If town and scum all lie, it's a lot harder to discern what team someone is on. I explained this 10 times, sorry to me my role was vanilla, and so nice of you to show up after 4 days while the rest of us did what we could to help town, and to decide what we did was wrong LOL
|
|
|
Post by guiri on May 30, 2012 17:44:09 GMT -5
For reference, unofficial color coded vote count, will do Day 2 tomorrow
----------Day 1---------- starrirain_v1 (14): MrSpecialEdArchangel[97], colby11[109], Gadarene[175], septimus_v1[325], Pleonast[560], mchlle71[579], dizzymrslizzy[599], lianne[604], richardbeckman[624], supermel[648], jmj697mn[650], annem[651], ascime[652], laurieRn[669]
dizzymrslizzy (6): SuburbanPlankton[65], wombat99_v1[198], SilverJan[332], Paranoia[404], cathi[581], starrirain_v1[596] Pleonast (6): CatInASuit[10], BillMc[13], Meeko[14], cassiepietz[117], michelehunter_v1[126], jmj697mn[142-308], dizzymrslizzy[266-364], francescaj[329]
Meeko (5): InnerStickler[28], Pleonast[35-338], SilverJan[151-332], lauriern[199-669], amykb[203], septimus[206-325], patricia[225], crys[228], annetastic[240]
SuburbanPlankton (2): Mahaloth[104], texcat[475]
texcat (1): guiri_v1[243], jmj697mn[308-650] Guiri_v1 (1): dizzymrslizzy[77-266], SusanKMurphy[150]
MrSpecialEdArchangel (1): oldred[154] cassiepietz (1): kagemoto[122], texcat[140-152] annetastic (1): allyjayne[244] michelehunter_v1 (1): Lightfoot[296] Lauriern (1): HalBriston[361] Gadarene (1): jerelijah[448] oldred (1): PhoenixPhyre[583]
gnarlycharlie (0): guiri_v1[9-243] wombat99_v1 (0): septimus_v1[136-206] catinasuit (0): Pleonast[338-560] jmj697mn (0): texcat[152-316] septimus_v1 (0): richbeckman[471-624]
Not Voting (18): gnarlycharlie, SisterCoyote, jlrinmke, MHaye, laxrules017, wombat99_v2, Septimus_v2, endhoot, JustBeingGinger, TotalUlla, aleetha, guiri_v2, mistde, Michelehunter_v2, Roosh, Starrirain_v2, Suits101, LadyRogue
|
|
|
Post by LadyRogue-II on May 30, 2012 18:16:35 GMT -5
For reference, unofficial color coded vote count, will do Day 2 tomorrow ---------- Day 1---------- starrirain_v1 (14): MrSpecialEdArchangel[97], colby11[109], Gadarene[175], septimus_v1[325], Pleonast[560], mchlle71[579], dizzymrslizzy[599], lianne[604], richardbeckman[624], supermel[648], jmj697mn[650], annem[651], ascime[652], laurieRn[669]dizzymrslizzy (6): SuburbanPlankton[65], wombat99_v1[198], SilverJan[332], Paranoia[404], cathi[581], starrirain_v1[596]Pleonast (6): CatInASuit[10], BillMc[13], Meeko[14], cassiepietz[117], michelehunter_v1[126], jmj697mn[142-308], dizzymrslizzy[266-364], francescaj[329]Meeko (5): InnerStickler[28], Pleonast[35-338], SilverJan[151-332], lauriern[199-669], amykb[203], septimus[206-325], patricia[225], crys[228], annetastic[240] SuburbanPlankton (2): Mahaloth[104], texcat[475] texcat (1): guiri_v1[243], jmj697mn[308-650]Guiri_v1 (1): dizzymrslizzy[77-266], SusanKMurphy[150] MrSpecialEdArchangel (1): oldred[154] cassiepietz (1): kagemoto[122], texcat[140-152]annetastic (1): allyjayne[244] michelehunter_v1 (1): Lightfoot[296]Lauriern (1): HalBriston[361] Gadarene (1): jerelijah[448] oldred (1): PhoenixPhyre[583] gnarlycharlie (0): guiri_v1[9-243]wombat99_v1 (0): septimus_v1[136-206]catinasuit (0): Pleonast[338-560]jmj697mn (0): texcat[152-316]septimus_v1 (0): richbeckman[471-624]Not Voting (18): gnarlycharlie, SisterCoyote, jlrinmke, MHaye, laxrules017, wombat99_v2, Septimus_v2, endhoot, JustBeingGinger, TotalUlla, aleetha, guiri_v2, mistde, Michelehunter_v2, Roosh, Starrirain_v2, Suits101, LadyRogue Actually if you look I voted it just posted AFTER Idle do to a glitch which I explained repeatedly.
|
|
Meeko
FGM
I raccoon it's time to play Mafia
Posts: 2,474
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Meeko on May 30, 2012 19:46:19 GMT -5
I fear the Mod has abandoned the game.
If not, it is very hard to do anything, with out knowing who is dead, who isn't, who is being replaced by who, and how much longer we have.
If there isn't going to be a Night 4, I don't see the point in playing.
There is no better way to phrase that.
We can argue how broken this game is later.
|
|
Meeko
FGM
I raccoon it's time to play Mafia
Posts: 2,474
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Meeko on May 30, 2012 19:49:03 GMT -5
Hello all I hope everyone in the states had a great holiday weekend. Not see much to write/talk about here in day 4 - I Guess Idle will post the vote count and confirm the kill when he can until then Vote: Meeko SIGH.Could you please give me A Rea......... Oh. In that case. Fuck off.
|
|
Meeko
FGM
I raccoon it's time to play Mafia
Posts: 2,474
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Meeko on May 30, 2012 19:58:58 GMT -5
Okay, not much to comment on Night Two. On to Day Three. Snipped. Hi Pleonast, I'm Meeko. I'm Male and I have AD/HD*. There. That should answer like 3/4 ths of your stuff against me. You ARE NOT more well to do in this game than I am. I know your play style leads you to think that you are. You are not confirmed as anything, therefore, for the time being, my play is just as good, just as valid as yours is. I have gone on record to state that I don't think Day 1 Votes should be held against a player. Early Day 1 votes, especially. Show me ANY game with ""good"" day 1 votes, relative to the information NOT given out to that point in the game, and I will show you Meeko not Voting for a Claiming Pleonast. [[[On Night 0, but we won't get into that]]] Again, I think you were born with more dollars than sense in the meatspace world, and I would love to talk to you about it after this game. In our games, we can have this dance, sure fine, but I do think you can teach me a few things that I can take with me back to meatspace. [ ]
But again, this is an appeal to a dialouge with you after, not durring. I am just seconding my own motion to this end.
*I really do think you didn't know this about me, otherwise you probably wouldn't have said Blinkie Light..... I won't hold this one against you. Also, I am Male. You can address with with "He" and "Him" etc.
I Really thought you had played enough games with me to know both of these things.
|
|
|
Post by Mahaloth on May 30, 2012 20:20:52 GMT -5
Meeko, have you claimed?
|
|
Meeko
FGM
I raccoon it's time to play Mafia
Posts: 2,474
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Meeko on May 30, 2012 20:24:16 GMT -5
I'm not sure how exactly you are asking this. I sense an Ulterior here. But I have. In passing. Back on Day 1-2 or so.
|
|
Colby11
Administrator
Creator of Hell's Kitchen Mafia
Posts: 1,193
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Colby11 on May 31, 2012 1:27:59 GMT -5
I fear the Mod has abandoned the game. If not, it is very hard to do anything, with out knowing who is dead, who isn't, who is being replaced by who, and how much longer we have. If there isn't going to be a Night 4, I don't see the point in playing. There is no better way to phrase that. We can argue how broken this game is later. From the ghost killer... Night ends tonight, in roughly 17 hours or so from this post. I suggest that everyone play as normal, and that we shouldn't panic too much. I will also contact Chris and see where his head is. In the meantime, I will make an unofficial vote count, since I am technically dead
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on May 31, 2012 1:33:32 GMT -5
I have not abandoned the game, Meeko...so I'll thank you to never think that I have.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on May 31, 2012 1:34:30 GMT -5
Colby, I have no idea what you're talking about. Day ends at Friday at Nine PM MY TIME.
That's in 2 more days (from right now).
I plan to catch up fully tomorrow. Until then, if anyone wants to do their own vote count, feel free.
But don't tell me I've abandoned the game when I have not, nor act like Day is ending soon when it's still 48 hours away.
|
|
Colby11
Administrator
Creator of Hell's Kitchen Mafia
Posts: 1,193
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Colby11 on May 31, 2012 1:48:13 GMT -5
Apologies, I thought that it was Friday. And it shows that I am not the mod lol
|
|
Colby11
Administrator
Creator of Hell's Kitchen Mafia
Posts: 1,193
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Colby11 on May 31, 2012 1:50:28 GMT -5
Unofficial vote count. Done with person, number beside the name is the post number in which they voted.
Texcat (4)- Guiri (4), Meeko (46), Suits101 (73), septimus (106) Ladyrogue (3)- dizzymrslizzy (26), Silver Jan (42), cathi (110) Meeko (3)- Texcat (49), mahaloth (55), Patricia (128) Pleonast (1)- oldred (59) Wombat99 (1)- Susan K. Murphy (101) Dizzymrslizzy (1)- Ladyrogue (112)
|
|
|
Post by Silver Jan on May 31, 2012 2:41:56 GMT -5
For reference, unofficial color coded vote count, will do Day 2 tomorrow ---------- Day 1---------- starrirain_v1 (14): MrSpecialEdArchangel[97], colby11[109], Gadarene[175], septimus_v1[325], Pleonast[560], mchlle71[579], dizzymrslizzy[599], lianne[604], richardbeckman[624], supermel[648], jmj697mn[650], annem[651], ascime[652], laurieRn[669]dizzymrslizzy (6): SuburbanPlankton[65], wombat99_v1[198], SilverJan[332], Paranoia[404], cathi[581], starrirain_v1[596]Pleonast (6): CatInASuit[10], BillMc[13], Meeko[14], cassiepietz[117], michelehunter_v1[126], jmj697mn[142-308], dizzymrslizzy[266-364], francescaj[329]Meeko (5): InnerStickler[28], Pleonast[35-338], SilverJan[151-332], lauriern[199-669], amykb[203], septimus[206-325], patricia[225], crys[228], annetastic[240] SuburbanPlankton (2): Mahaloth[104], texcat[475] texcat (1): guiri_v1[243], jmj697mn[308-650]Guiri_v1 (1): dizzymrslizzy[77-266], SusanKMurphy[150] MrSpecialEdArchangel (1): oldred[154] cassiepietz (1): kagemoto[122], texcat[140-152]annetastic (1): allyjayne[244] michelehunter_v1 (1): Lightfoot[296]Lauriern (1): HalBriston[361] Gadarene (1): jerelijah[448] oldred (1): PhoenixPhyre[583] gnarlycharlie (0): guiri_v1[9-243]wombat99_v1 (0): septimus_v1[136-206]catinasuit (0): Pleonast[338-560]jmj697mn (0): texcat[152-316]septimus_v1 (0): richbeckman[471-624]Not Voting (18): gnarlycharlie, SisterCoyote, jlrinmke, MHaye, laxrules017, wombat99_v2, Septimus_v2, endhoot, JustBeingGinger, TotalUlla, aleetha, guiri_v2, mistde, Michelehunter_v2, Roosh, Starrirain_v2, Suits101, LadyRogue Actually if you look I voted it just posted AFTER Idle do to a glitch which I explained repeatedly. Which really means that you didn't vote! I know you are voting toDay but it just looks like an OMGUS vote, is dizzy your only suspect? I know these games are hard but you need to talk so that the rest of us can get a read on you, all you are posting right now are defensive posts, that does NOT help Town. If you haven't got a suspect scum in your sights, who do you think is Town? That helps too. At the moment I think Pleo, Susan and guiri are Town, that could change of course but it helps me to try and weed out scum. When I have played as scum I find it rather difficult to make a case against someone that I know is Town, is that why you aren't posting a lot? Yep, my vote is staying just where it is! @ Meeko, I think you are being just rude in this game. How many more reasons do you need from Patricia? Unless she is a detective and knows that you are scum I think she has placed a reasonable vote. In fact, if my vote wasn't on LadyRogue I would be very tempted to place a vote on you again.
|
|