timmy
Mome Rath
In the frozen land of Nador they were forced to eat Robin's minstrels. And there was much rejoicing
Posts: 189
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 17:51:40 GMT -5
Post by timmy on Oct 20, 2010 17:51:40 GMT -5
Do you know why the action you performed at the Batcave didn't end up with you being interrogated, but the more recent one did? Yes.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 17:57:46 GMT -5
Post by special on Oct 20, 2010 17:57:46 GMT -5
Do you know why the action you performed at the Batcave didn't end up with you being interrogated, but the more recent one did? Yes. Would it be beneficial to Town if you told us?
|
|
timmy
Mome Rath
In the frozen land of Nador they were forced to eat Robin's minstrels. And there was much rejoicing
Posts: 189
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 18:31:13 GMT -5
Post by timmy on Oct 20, 2010 18:31:13 GMT -5
Would it be beneficial to Town if you told us? Told you before. Was interrogated because of action. Also told you before. Interrogation has nothing to do with anything or anyone else but me.
|
|
timmy
Mome Rath
In the frozen land of Nador they were forced to eat Robin's minstrels. And there was much rejoicing
Posts: 189
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 18:47:01 GMT -5
Post by timmy on Oct 20, 2010 18:47:01 GMT -5
Some things not making sense about Dex as Scum Jailer.
Jails Town Doc Day 2. Scum had opportunity to kill her Night 2, Night 3. Instead wait to Night 4. Why release Doc to Jail Scum Cop? Scum tried to NK Batman Night 2. Instead jails him Day 5. With Elinor dead, no one to protect Batman, try to kill him instead of jailing him? He gets results, bad news for Scum.
Not arguing about Batman's results. If he says Dex Scum, that's good enough for me. Maybe Jailer role is unusual this game. Seems pointless if handled by Scum. But more dangerous to Town if handled by Townie. Like Vig role.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 19:08:31 GMT -5
Post by special on Oct 20, 2010 19:08:31 GMT -5
Would it be beneficial to Town if you told us? Told you before. Was interrogated because of action. Also told you before. Interrogation has nothing to do with anything or anyone else but me. But you also performed the same action previously and you weren't interrogated then. You've stated that you know why this is true.
|
|
timmy
Mome Rath
In the frozen land of Nador they were forced to eat Robin's minstrels. And there was much rejoicing
Posts: 189
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 19:25:38 GMT -5
Post by timmy on Oct 20, 2010 19:25:38 GMT -5
Told you before. Was interrogated because of action. Also told you before. Interrogation has nothing to do with anything or anyone else but me. But you also performed the same action previously and you weren't interrogated then. You've stated that you know why this is true. Not following your point. Please explain?
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 19:30:18 GMT -5
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Oct 20, 2010 19:30:18 GMT -5
I don't know about Dr. Rajesh's point, but a point of contention that I have is that apparently the Mod's just decided to beam you out of the game for kicks and giggles, which I find absurd.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 19:32:32 GMT -5
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Oct 20, 2010 19:32:32 GMT -5
Further, you don't seem to find anything wrong with being taken out of the game for no apparent reason, and you don't seem to notice the confusion and effect that the event and your self-imposed cute little way of talking about it doesn't do much but add to the confusion.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 19:33:52 GMT -5
Post by special on Oct 20, 2010 19:33:52 GMT -5
But you also performed the same action previously and you weren't interrogated then. You've stated that you know why this is true. Not following your point. Please explain? Maybe I misunderstood. I thought you were saying that your interrogation was the result of using your own power. Like a side effect of using your power. That made me wonder why it happened this time but not the previous time. Did I make an error somewhere?
|
|
timmy
Mome Rath
In the frozen land of Nador they were forced to eat Robin's minstrels. And there was much rejoicing
Posts: 189
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 19:43:14 GMT -5
Post by timmy on Oct 20, 2010 19:43:14 GMT -5
Not following your point. Please explain? Maybe I misunderstood. I thought you were saying that your interrogation was the result of using your own power. Like a side effect of using your power. That made me wonder why it happened this time but not the previous time. Did I make an error somewhere? No. You are correct.
|
|
timmy
Mome Rath
In the frozen land of Nador they were forced to eat Robin's minstrels. And there was much rejoicing
Posts: 189
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 19:45:28 GMT -5
Post by timmy on Oct 20, 2010 19:45:28 GMT -5
I don't know about Dr. Rajesh's point, but a point of contention that I have is that apparently the Mod's just decided to beam you out of the game for kicks and giggles, which I find absurd. Mods did that because of my Night action. No kicks and giggles. And only for Night action submitted Night 4. Why is this difficult to understand?
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 19:48:44 GMT -5
Post by special on Oct 20, 2010 19:48:44 GMT -5
I don't know about Dr. Rajesh's point, but a point of contention that I have is that apparently the Mod's just decided to beam you out of the game for kicks and giggles, which I find absurd. Mods did that because of my Night action. No kicks and giggles. And only for Night action submitted Night 4. Why is this difficult to understand? It's not difficult to understand. I asked if you knew why one action resulted in your interogation and one did not. You replied that you did. I asked you if it would help Town if you told us what that difference was. You didn't answer that, but implied that you'd already told us. So, while I understand that one action resulted in the interrogation and one did not, I do not understand why. You've stated that you do. Maybe you need a direct request. Please explain to us why one action resulted in your interrogation and one action did not.
|
|
timmy
Mome Rath
In the frozen land of Nador they were forced to eat Robin's minstrels. And there was much rejoicing
Posts: 189
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 19:49:18 GMT -5
Post by timmy on Oct 20, 2010 19:49:18 GMT -5
Further, you don't seem to find anything wrong with being taken out of the game for no apparent reason, and you don't seem to notice the confusion and effect that the event and your self-imposed cute little way of talking about it doesn't do much but add to the confusion. Know well what reason is. Seems you want everything handed to you in neat little package. Don't know who you are, which side of game you're on. You tell me what you are, I will tell you what I am.
|
|
timmy
Mome Rath
In the frozen land of Nador they were forced to eat Robin's minstrels. And there was much rejoicing
Posts: 189
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 19:51:40 GMT -5
Post by timmy on Oct 20, 2010 19:51:40 GMT -5
Mods did that because of my Night action. No kicks and giggles. And only for Night action submitted Night 4. Why is this difficult to understand? It's not difficult to understand. I asked if you knew why one action resulted in your interogation and one did not. You replied that you did. I asked you if it would help Town if you told us what that difference was. You didn't answer that, but implied that you'd already told us. So, while I understand that one action resulted in the interrogation and one did not, I do not understand why. You've stated that you do. Maybe you need a direct request. Please explain to us why one action resulted in your interrogation and one action did not. Was not directing reply to you, Dr. Was directing to the Monk. Do you speak for the Monk as well as yourself?
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 19:52:10 GMT -5
Post by special on Oct 20, 2010 19:52:10 GMT -5
Further, you don't seem to find anything wrong with being taken out of the game for no apparent reason, and you don't seem to notice the confusion and effect that the event and your self-imposed cute little way of talking about it doesn't do much but add to the confusion. Know well what reason is. Seems you want everything handed to you in neat little package. Don't know who you are, which side of game you're on. You tell me what you are, I will tell you what I am. I am a Town Vigilante.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 19:52:56 GMT -5
Post by special on Oct 20, 2010 19:52:56 GMT -5
It's not difficult to understand. I asked if you knew why one action resulted in your interogation and one did not. You replied that you did. I asked you if it would help Town if you told us what that difference was. You didn't answer that, but implied that you'd already told us. So, while I understand that one action resulted in the interrogation and one did not, I do not understand why. You've stated that you do. Maybe you need a direct request. Please explain to us why one action resulted in your interrogation and one action did not. Was not directing reply to you, Dr. Was directing to the Monk. Do you speak for the Monk as well as yourself? No, I speak for myself, but I will respond to anyone no matter who they are talking to if I see fit
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 19:54:01 GMT -5
Post by special on Oct 20, 2010 19:54:01 GMT -5
and sometimes even when I think it's meant for me and it's not. like that last one.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 20:03:20 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Oct 20, 2010 20:03:20 GMT -5
Further, you don't seem to find anything wrong with being taken out of the game for no apparent reason, and you don't seem to notice the confusion and effect that the event and your self-imposed cute little way of talking about it doesn't do much but add to the confusion. Know well what reason is. Seems you want everything handed to you in neat little package. Don't know who you are, which side of game you're on. You tell me what you are, I will tell you what I am. otay, i'll play i am a town mason. what are you?
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 20:10:40 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Oct 20, 2010 20:10:40 GMT -5
neta: that last one was from the monk, monkey, peek, peekercpa, peeker, george.
i wonder if cookies, cometothedarkside, darkcookies, cookieside, whatthefuckhisherpmnameagain has anything to add.
woot the fucking woot.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 20:31:21 GMT -5
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Oct 20, 2010 20:31:21 GMT -5
Is that a request for me to claim?
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 20:32:47 GMT -5
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Oct 20, 2010 20:32:47 GMT -5
NETA: I would be willing to do a mass claim if so, but hearing from the rest of the field would probably be best.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 20:37:15 GMT -5
Post by special on Oct 20, 2010 20:37:15 GMT -5
NETA: I would be willing to do a mass claim if so, but hearing from the rest of the field would probably be best. Why don't we lynch Dexter first and then consider a mass claim toMorrow
|
|
Hockey Monkey!
Borogrove
This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker over who killed who.
Posts: 371
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 21:12:24 GMT -5
Post by Hockey Monkey! on Oct 20, 2010 21:12:24 GMT -5
Some things not making sense about Dex as Scum Jailer. Jails Town Doc Day 2. Scum had opportunity to kill her Night 2, Night 3. Instead wait to Night 4. Why release Doc to Jail Scum Cop? Scum tried to NK Batman Night 2. Instead jails him Day 5. With Elinor dead, no one to protect Batman, try to kill him instead of jailing him? He gets results, bad news for Scum. Not arguing about Batman's results. If he says Dex Scum, that's good enough for me. Maybe Jailer role is unusual this game. Seems pointless if handled by Scum. But more dangerous to Town if handled by Townie. Like Vig role. Except Batman didn't investigate me. He gave results today on Death of Rats...he only has suspicions of me. Zedd is the one who says I'm scum. I'm not. Either Zedd is lying or his results are tainted.
|
|
Hockey Monkey!
Borogrove
This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker over who killed who.
Posts: 371
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 21:15:31 GMT -5
Post by Hockey Monkey! on Oct 20, 2010 21:15:31 GMT -5
NETA: I would be willing to do a mass claim if so, but hearing from the rest of the field would probably be best. Why don't we lynch Dexter first and then consider a mass claim toMorrow I object!
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 21:35:32 GMT -5
Post by special on Oct 20, 2010 21:35:32 GMT -5
Why don't we lynch Dexter first and then consider a mass claim toMorrow I object! Your objection is noted. What is the neck size on your shirts?
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 20, 2010 21:36:04 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Oct 20, 2010 21:36:04 GMT -5
Why don't we lynch Dexter first and then consider a mass claim toMorrow I object! i know that we are trying to win but it is just this type of post that makes it all worth while. we can't kill henny youngman. lol
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 21, 2010 2:20:38 GMT -5
Post by BillMc on Oct 21, 2010 2:20:38 GMT -5
Mods did that because of my Night action. No kicks and giggles. And only for Night action submitted Night 4. Why is this difficult to understand? Ok, posting in character is cute, and it may even be a post restriction, but it does appear to be narking people off. As I said elsewhere, if anyone is actually play attention, it's pretty obvious what sort of role Rorschach has (and for that matter, Skellington has - tho that will be pretty much confirmed by dusk). While Raj's chance of success apparently decreases with each use, it would appear that there is a potential penalty for Rorschach using his power, and being interogated was it.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 21, 2010 7:48:05 GMT -5
Post by severe delays on Oct 21, 2010 7:48:05 GMT -5
1) Rorschach, your writing style appears to have changed sinced you returned to us. Which was why I asked if you were under a posting restriction. You have said that you have no posting restriction. Are you under any other kind of restriction as a result of your interrogation?
2) Are you saying that using your Night Action on Night 4 is the trigger for your interrogation? So if you have used it on any other Night or use it on any future Night you will not be interrogated?
3) It's still unclear what 'interrogation' means. It could be either a colour word or something relevant to the game. During the time that you were removed from the game did you receive any communication where you were asked questions or given information? And if so, is there any benefit to town in you telling us what that communication entailed?
|
|
timmy
Mome Rath
In the frozen land of Nador they were forced to eat Robin's minstrels. And there was much rejoicing
Posts: 189
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 21, 2010 8:20:38 GMT -5
Post by timmy on Oct 21, 2010 8:20:38 GMT -5
Rorschach may speak and act normally. As you see, I am under no imposed restriction according to Mods. My power has certain drawbacks that increase exponentially each time I wield it. The first Night was guaranteed successful. Second Night also successful, but adverse side effect rendered target incapable of performing Night action. Chose different target Night 4. Target appeared unaffected but adverse side effect took me out of game. Mods called it Interrogation. Was not jailed, could be voted on by players. Am not trying to be difficult with responses. Am committed to staying with role entire game. No compromise.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 21, 2010 8:50:24 GMT -5
Post by severe delays on Oct 21, 2010 8:50:24 GMT -5
Thanks, that makes more sense. I'm cool with you staying in role, I just couldn't understand your responses. Maybe you need to go back to journalling after your terrible ordeal.
|
|